From: CGEL <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org,
oleksandr@natalenko.name, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>, Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn>,
Yunkai Zhang <zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn>,
Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each processg
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 06:35:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6285e519.1c69fb81.4f3fe.8057@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YoTjJH7+QD+DSrW8@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:14:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 18-05-22 07:40:30, CGEL wrote:
> [...]
> > 2. process_madvise is still a kind of madvise. processs_madvise from
> > another process overrides the intention of origin app code ifself that
> > also calls madvise, which is unrecoverable. For example, if a process "A"
> > which madvises just one part of VMAs (not all) as MERGEABLE run on the OS
> > already, meanwhile, if another process which doesn't know the information
> > of "A" 's MERGEABLE areas, then call process_madvise to advise all VMAs of
> > "A" as MERGEABLE, the original MERGEABLE information of "A" calling madivse
> > is erasured permanently.
>
> I do not really follow. How is this any different from an external
> process modifying the process wide policy via the proc or any other
> interface?
In this patch, you can see that we didn't modify the flag of any VMA of
the target process, which is different from process_madvise. So it is
easy to keep the original MERGEABLE information of the target process
when we turn back to the default state from the state "always".
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 9:27 [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each process cgel.zte
2022-05-17 14:04 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-18 2:47 ` CGEL
2022-05-18 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-19 6:23 ` CGEL
2022-05-19 7:35 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-19 8:02 ` CGEL
2022-05-19 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-18 6:58 ` Balbir Singh
2022-05-18 7:40 ` [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each processg CGEL
2022-05-18 12:14 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-19 6:35 ` CGEL [this message]
2022-05-19 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-24 8:52 ` CGEL
2022-05-24 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-25 6:56 ` CGEL
2022-05-25 7:38 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-18 14:31 ` [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each process Jann Horn
2022-05-19 3:39 ` CGEL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6285e519.1c69fb81.4f3fe.8057@mx.google.com \
--to=cgel.zte@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=wang.yong12@zte.com.cn \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.