All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vfs-scale, d_revalidate from nfsd
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:47:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6291.1295063252@jrobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=H7Zhe4VMsh_tdrd7Atb9FX8j4AdiMNepXGsj9@mail.gmail.com>


Nick Piggin:
> Of course. I was discussing it with Miklos yesterday too, but haven't
> finished getting a proposal together.
>
> The main idea here would be to just pass in a flags parameter rather
> thank poking in nd to get the rcu-walk status. That would solve this
> problem and also avoid nd for most filesystems that don't care about
> it.

Let me make sure.
- add a flag parameter to ->d_revalidate. not remove the panameter nd.
- FS ->d_revalidate() will (probably) return -ECHILD when LOOKUP_RCU is
  set.
Right?


Then how about the callers?
Current sequence is
- NFSD calls lookup_one_len
- __lookup_hash
- do_revalidate
- d_revalidate
{
	status = dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, nd);
	if (status == -ECHILD) {
		;;;
		status = dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, nd);
	}
}

There will be no change in NFSD but VFS d_revalidate(), such like this?
VFS d_revalidate()
{
	if (nd) {
		dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, nd, nd->flags);
		if (-ECHILD) {
			dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, nd, nd->flags);
		}
	} else
		return dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, NULL, 0);
}


J. R. Okajima

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-15  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-13 14:03 vfs-scale, d_revalidate from nfsd J. R. Okajima
2011-01-14  2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:03   ` Al Viro
2011-01-14  3:12     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:12       ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:20       ` Al Viro
2011-01-14  3:22         ` Al Viro
2011-01-14  3:29         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:29           ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:38           ` Al Viro
2011-01-15  3:47       ` J. R. Okajima [this message]
2011-01-15 18:11         ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-15  5:07   ` J. R. Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6291.1295063252@jrobl \
    --to=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.