Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf,sockmap: fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues

[John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>]

Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 09:54 AM +08, wangyufen wrote:
> > 在 2022/5/28 5:37, Cong Wang 写道:
> >> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 03:53:11PM +0800, Wang Yufen wrote:
> >>> During TCP sockmap redirect pressure test, the following warning is triggered:
> >>> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2145 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xbc/0xd0
> >>> CPU: 3 PID: 2145 Comm: iperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G        W         5.10.0+ #9
> >>> Call Trace:
> >>>   inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
> >>>   inet_csk_listen_stop+0xbb/0x380
> >>>   tcp_close+0x41b/0x480
> >>>   inet_release+0x42/0x80
> >>>   __sock_release+0x3d/0xa0
> >>>   sock_close+0x11/0x20
> >>>   __fput+0x9d/0x240
> >>>   task_work_run+0x62/0x90
> >>>   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x110/0x120
> >>>   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190
> >>>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> >>>
> >>> The reason we observed is that:
> >>> When the listener is closing, a connection may have completed the three-way
> >>> handshake but not accepted, and the client has sent some packets. The child
> >>> sks in accept queue release by inet_child_forget()->inet_csk_destroy_sock(),
> >>> but psocks of child sks have not released.
> >>>
> >> Hm, in this scenario, how does the child socket end up in the sockmap?
> >> Clearly user-space does not have a chance to get an fd yet.
> >>
> >> And, how does your patch work? Since the child sock does not even inheirt
> >> the sock proto after clone (see the comments above tcp_bpf_clone()) at
> >> all?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> .
> > My test cases are as follows:
> >
> > __section("sockops")
> > int bpf_sockmap(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
> > {
> >     switch (skops->op) {
> >         case BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB:
> >         case BPF_SOCK_OPS_ACTIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB:
> >             ...
> >             bpf_sock_hash_update(skops, &sock_ops_map, &key, BPF_NOEXIST);
> >             break;
> >         ...
> > }
> 
> Right, when processing the final ACK in tcp_rcv_state_process(), we
> invoke the BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB BPF callback.
> 
> This gives a chance to install sockmap sk_prot callbacks.
> 
> An accept() without ever calling accept() ;-)
> 
> [...]

LGTM as well.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>