From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E84C433EF for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-317-zrJBFX-HMQyvhGMjFFsWGg-1; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:30:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: zrJBFX-HMQyvhGMjFFsWGg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72E54654; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31206101E592; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CA61809CB8; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 20UKTusF031078 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:29:56 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 0D8E4112131B; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast03.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08CF81121314 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5580B811E7A for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plutone.assyoma.it (host195-56-237-212.serverdedicati.aruba.it [212.237.56.195]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-500-5PDQd_xsOEyrnxU9qce_HA-1; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:29:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5PDQd_xsOEyrnxU9qce_HA-1 Received: from webmail.assyoma.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by plutone.assyoma.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8AA2BDD9A3FA; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 21:22:00 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 21:22:00 +0100 From: Gionatan Danti To: LVM general discussion and development In-Reply-To: References: <9156ffae-650d-198d-5c7a-32f84dbcb332@gmail.com> <83468eda-6697-5f15-d949-e23611cded84@gmail.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13 Message-ID: <629a699cb96d9be06152fc7fffac235a@assyoma.it> X-Sender: g.danti@assyoma.it X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-loop: linux-lvm@redhat.com Cc: Demi Marie Obenour Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool X-BeenThere: linux-lvm@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Il 2022-01-30 12:18 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto: > Thin is more oriented towards extreme speed. > VDO is more about 'compression & deduplication' - so space efficiency. > > Combining both together is kind of harming their advantages. Unfortunately, it is the only (current) solution to have snapshotting with data compression/deduplication. Integrating snapshot capability into VDO would be awesome! Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8 _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/