From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>
To: Phantazm <phantazm@phantazm.nu>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in MDADM or just crappy computer?
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:26:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62b0912f050422052612fac70a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cv9gbc$84g$1@sea.gmane.org>
Phantazm wrote:
> And the kernel log is filled up with this.
>
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: md0: sync done.
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: md0: sync done.
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
No "sync done" here? What is it doing, multiple syncs in parallel?
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
Again (below line)?
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: using maximum available idle IO bandwith (but
> not more than 15000 KB/sec) for reconstruction.
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: using 128k window, over a total of 199141632
> blocks.
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: md0: sync done.
There we go, a "sync done" (above)....
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
But then again (below)..
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
And again...
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
And again...
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
And again?!
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
And again...
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] .<6>md: syncing RAID array md0
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 5000
> KB/sec/disc.
And again...
> Feb 20 08:43:13 [kernel] md: syncing RAID array md0
[snip]
Odd!
> aint got a single clue what it could be.
I'm seeing something that looks like the same, so let me know if you
found out what happened.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-22 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-20 8:11 Bug in MDADM or just crappy computer? Phantazm
2005-02-20 9:41 ` Phantazm
2005-02-20 10:38 ` Phantazm
2005-04-22 12:26 ` Molle Bestefich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62b0912f050422052612fac70a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=molle.bestefich@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phantazm@phantazm.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.