All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, abhay.maheshbhai.maheta@intel.com
Subject: RE: hci_event: handling CIS QoS
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 21:05:53 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <637712b1.620a0220.28145.3c35@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116143334.4990-1-abhay.maheshbhai.maheta@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5139 bytes --]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=696036

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      0.55 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.23 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 FAIL      0.50 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      38.42 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      34.97 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      486.31 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      17.60 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         FAIL      17.97 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      6.05 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        PASS      116.88 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      10.35 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      9.81 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      11.29 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        PASS      7.82 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      9.72 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      6.52 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      36.32 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: SubjectPrefix - FAIL
Desc: Check subject contains "Bluetooth" prefix
Output:
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
##############################
Test: TestRunner_iso-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run iso-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 55, Passed: 11 (20.0%), Failed: 44, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
ISO QoS 8_1_1 - Success                              Failed       2.011 seconds
ISO QoS 8_2_1 - Success                              Failed       0.181 seconds
ISO QoS 16_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.177 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_1 CIG 0x01 - Success                    Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_1 CIG 0x01 CIS 0x01 - Success           Failed       0.173 seconds
ISO QoS 24_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.176 seconds
ISO QoS 24_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.172 seconds
ISO QoS 32_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 32_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.177 seconds
ISO QoS 44_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.177 seconds
ISO QoS 44_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.172 seconds
ISO QoS 48_1_1 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 48_2_1 - Success                             Failed       0.160 seconds
ISO QoS 48_3_1 - Success                             Failed       0.172 seconds
ISO QoS 48_4_1 - Success                             Failed       0.164 seconds
ISO QoS 48_5_1 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 48_6_1 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 8_1_2 - Success                              Failed       0.162 seconds
ISO QoS 8_2_2 - Success                              Failed       0.165 seconds
ISO QoS 16_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.163 seconds
ISO QoS 16_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.168 seconds
ISO QoS 24_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.175 seconds
ISO QoS 24_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.165 seconds
ISO QoS 32_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 32_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.173 seconds
ISO QoS 44_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 44_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO QoS 48_1_2 - Success                             Failed       0.175 seconds
ISO QoS 48_2_2 - Success                             Failed       0.169 seconds
ISO QoS 48_3_2 - Success                             Failed       0.165 seconds
ISO QoS 48_4_2 - Success                             Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO QoS 48_5_2 - Success                             Failed       0.164 seconds
ISO QoS 48_6_2 - Success                             Failed       0.161 seconds
ISO Connect2 CIG 0x01 - Success                      Failed       0.215 seconds
ISO Send - Success                                   Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO Receive - Success                                Failed       0.167 seconds
ISO Defer Send - Success                             Failed       0.170 seconds
ISO 48_2_1 Defer Send - Success                      Failed       0.168 seconds
ISO Defer Receive - Success                          Failed       0.168 seconds
ISO 48_2_1 Defer Receive - Success                   Failed       0.163 seconds
ISO Send and Receive - Success                       Failed       0.184 seconds
ISO Disconnect - Success                             Failed       0.174 seconds
ISO Reconnect - Success                              Failed       0.168 seconds


---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16 14:33 [PATCH] hci_event: handling CIS QoS Abhay Maheta
2022-11-16 15:03 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-16 21:28   ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2022-11-16 15:27 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
2022-11-16 23:01 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-18  4:15 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-18  5:05 ` bluez.test.bot [this message]
2022-11-18  5:56 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-18  7:07 ` bluez.test.bot
2022-11-18  7:54 ` bluez.test.bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=637712b1.620a0220.28145.3c35@mx.google.com \
    --to=bluez.test.bot@gmail.com \
    --cc=abhay.maheshbhai.maheta@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.