From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Halbuer <halbuer@sra.uni-hannover.de>,
"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: reduce lock contention of pcp buffer refill
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:27:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63ebc499.a70a0220.9ac51.29ea@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70fc9040-f976-0314-46e8-d9ddad82ccf5@suse.cz>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:45:14AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> But I wonder also what kernel hardening folks think here - are the hardened
> kernels usually built with DEBUG_VM or debug_pagealloc enabled, or would you
> like to hook some other kernel option for keeping the checks on page/alloc
> free active? And should those checks be done on every alloc/free, including
> pcplist cached allocations?
What we're depending on for heap-related (i.e. both page allocator and
slab) hardening currently is:
- CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED
- pointer obfuscation (SLUB) -- freelist_ptr(), set_freepointer()
- pool membership verification (SLUB and SLAB) -- cache_from_obj()
- consecutive double free detection (SLUB and SLAB) -- __free_one()
- allocation order randomization
- CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM (SLUB and SLAB)
- CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR (page allocator)
- memory wiping (both slab and page allocator)
- init_on_alloc / CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON
- init_on_free / CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON
I'd be nice to gain slab redzone verification, but that seems expensive
enough that anyone interested in that level of hardening has likely
turned on full KASAN.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 16:25 [PATCH] mm: reduce lock contention of pcp buffer refill Alexander Halbuer
2023-02-02 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-07 16:11 ` Alexander Halbuer
2023-02-08 15:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-02-09 10:34 ` Alexander Halbuer
2023-02-08 10:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-02-14 17:27 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-02-08 15:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-29 9:31 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63ebc499.a70a0220.9ac51.29ea@mx.google.com \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=halbuer@sra.uni-hannover.de \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.