From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin@hpe.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@canonical.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andy.liang@hpe.com, david.chang@hpe.com, s.collins@hpe.com,
jenifer.golmitz@hpe.com, pravallika.kamma@hpe.com,
zhen-dong.lai@hpe.com, zachary.pabor-ext@hpe.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/PM: Restore BARs after powering up during enumeration
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:09:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <642c49e1-7d47-44fd-b597-e5ff0877bb56@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iGhqaF1m-Vc2xdXQXj_BxPFFWCBTP=Ypg_gWQEqWkNfg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/12/26 06:34, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 12:47 PM Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin@hpe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Commit 4d4c10f763d7 ("PCI: Explicitly put devices into D0 when
>> initializing") added pci_pm_power_up_and_verify_state() to pci_pm_init().
>> The helper ignores pci_power_up()'s return value indicating that BARs
>> need restoring. Its resume callers restore saved configuration
>> afterwards; pci_pm_init() does not.
>>
>> D3hot-to-D0 may reset a device and lose its BARs (PCI PM 1.2, sec 5.4.1).
>> After enumeration powers it up, pci_enable_device() reads D0 and skips
>> the full power-up path. Previously, a device still in D3hot at enable
>> time took that path, including BAR restoration.
>>
>> On AMD Venice SP7, two AMD xHCI controllers [1022:17d2] are in runtime
>> D3hot with No_Soft_Reset clear before kdump. Diagnostic reads on
>> v7.3-rc6-37 show the following for 0000:01:00.4 in the crash kernel:
>>
>> PMCSR BAR0
>> before the platform power call 0003 f4100004
>> after the platform power call 0003 f4100004
>> after native D0 power-up 0000 00000004
>>
>> The upper BAR DWORD stays zero. pci_power_up() returns 1, but the BAR
>> address remains zero while dev->resource[0] still contains 0xf4100000.
>> Without BAR restoration, the last console messages are around:
>>
>> pci 0000:01:00.4: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>
>> Restoring both controllers' BARs gives matching readbacks and allows
>> kdump to save a vmcore and reboot. An AMD Turin xHCI [1022:1557] shows
>> the same BAR loss; restoring its BAR also allows kdump to complete.
>>
>> Use pci_set_full_power_state() in pci_pm_init() to power up the device
>> and restore its BARs when needed. It already checks the native power
>> state before restoring and updates ASPM when link state is present.
>> Leave pci_pm_power_up_and_verify_state() unchanged for the resume
>> callers, which restore saved configuration afterwards.
>>
>> Read the initial power state first, as pci_enable_device_flags() does.
>
> Is this really necessary or even useful before pci_set_full_power_state()?
>
> pci_power_up() updates dev->current_state regardless of its previous
> value AFAICS.
>
To add to this comment; I would expect that if it's an ACPI device that
it is currently in ACPI_STATE_UNKNOWN at the time this function is
called. So it should be a no-op for those devices.
I'd say you can just update current state since you're forcing it to D0.
>> Otherwise, PCI_UNKNOWN can request a BAR restore even for devices
>> already in D0. Keep the final pci_update_current_state() call so the
>> final cached state still accounts for platform power and failed config
>> reads.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> Fixes: 4d4c10f763d7 ("PCI: Explicitly put devices into D0 when initializing")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin@hpe.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Use pci_set_full_power_state() in pci_pm_init(), following Mario's
>> suggestion to reuse the existing BAR restore code.
>> - Leave the shared resume helper and its interface unchanged.
>> - Keep the initial state readback and the final platform-aware refresh.
>>
>> Unlike v1, BAR restoration uses the full helper's native PMCSR check.
>> It also updates ASPM when link state exists.
>>
>> Tested v2 with kdump on both systems. Normal boots made no BAR writes
>> from this path. The crash kernels wrote only the cleared xHCI BARs:
>> two on Venice SP7 and one on Turin. All readbacks matched. kdump saved
>> 2.53 GB and 1.10 GB vmcores respectively before rebooting.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261008133708.947908-1-keng-yu.lin@hpe.com/
>> Review: https://lore.kernel.org/r/04f5463b-f123-4079-9286-06a241976d3a@amd.com/
>>
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 8cc6a89130b5..d3a5871e1b36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -3255,7 +3255,9 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> }
>>
>> poweron:
>> - pci_pm_power_up_and_verify_state(dev);
>> + pci_update_current_state(dev, dev->current_state);
>> + pci_set_full_power_state(dev, false);
>> + pci_update_current_state(dev, PCI_D0);
>> pm_runtime_forbid(&dev->dev);
>>
>> /*
>>
>> base-commit: 7b63ef2d55f24519e7e9e5f4d15dbea03f126e40
>> --
>> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 10:46 [PATCH v2] PCI/PM: Restore BARs after powering up during enumeration Keng-Yu Lin
2026-10-12 10:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 11:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-10-12 17:09 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-10-13 6:09 ` Keng-Yu Lin
2026-10-13 15:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-10-13 15:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-10-13 15:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-10-13 16:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-10-13 21:48 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=642c49e1-7d47-44fd-b597-e5ff0877bb56@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=andy.liang@hpe.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=david.chang@hpe.com \
--cc=jenifer.golmitz@hpe.com \
--cc=keng-yu.lin@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.ruffell@canonical.com \
--cc=pravallika.kamma@hpe.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=s.collins@hpe.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zachary.pabor-ext@hpe.com \
--cc=zhen-dong.lai@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.