From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:47:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6448.1229622476@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081218092557.b274e9dd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> Should include/linux/buffer_head.h have an empty stub for fsync_super()
> or does fscache even make sense when CONFIG_BLOCK=n?
FS-Cache might. CacheFiles probably doesn't.
There've been discussions about a separate caching backend to deal with
non-rotating media such as large chunks of battery-backed RAM or flash.
FS-Cache might make sense in such a situation as these could be accessed in
other ways (such as through MTD or even directly).
I'll make CONFIG_CACHEFILES dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 12:06 linux-next: Tree for December 18 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-18 17:21 ` linux-next: Tree for December 18 (slow-work) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-18 17:45 ` David Howells
2008-12-18 17:25 ` linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-18 17:47 ` David Howells [this message]
2008-12-18 23:57 ` linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-19 0:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-19 0:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-19 0:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-19 1:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-19 0:14 ` linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-19 10:39 ` Dave Chinner
2008-12-22 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6448.1229622476@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.