From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=mspinler@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41Zqlg6JHHzDrH0 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 06:31:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6OKTYO9023511 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:57 -0400 Received: from e15.ny.us.ibm.com (e15.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.205]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ke7nhh58q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e15.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:55 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e15.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.202) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:52 -0400 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w6OKVp7Z17105308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:31:51 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2EE112066; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD372112061; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.16.170.189]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:31:36 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:38:05 -0500 From: Matt Spinler To: Sai Dasari Cc: Vernon Mauery , Patrick Venture , OpenBMC Maillist , openbmc Subject: Re: In-Band Firmware Update In-Reply-To: <7BB65E38-8F1D-4723-B1C5-74102D4D0B20@fb.com> References: <20180723221837.GI105329@mauery> <7BB65E38-8F1D-4723-B1C5-74102D4D0B20@fb.com> X-Sender: mspinler@linux.vnet.ibm.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18072420-0068-0000-0000-0000031CDDF7 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009424; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01065595; UDB=6.00547393; IPR=6.00843453; MB=3.00022306; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-07-24 20:31:54 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18072420-0069-0000-0000-000045258A5F Message-Id: <6491f54b7b2da630cd3796c6bc3a5214@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-24_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807240216 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:32:00 -0000 On 2018-07-23 19:13, Sai Dasari wrote: > Any thoughts on reusing/leveraging the PICMG's hpm spec @ > https://www.picmg.org/openstandards/hardware-platform-management/ . > One of the benefit would be the standard 'ipmitool' has native support > for the update and changes are limited to BMC f/w. > On a downside, the firmware binary has to be repackaged as .hpm format > for this protocol to do some preparation steps as it support multiple > f/w components in a single package. This was brought up a few months ago and decided against: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2017-November/009938.html We are going to investigate using the DFU protocol, as that also has host side tools already available. > > --Vernon