All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Register and unregister a struct_ops by their bpf_links.
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:38:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64d1219c-3d07-733a-17cc-17bb8fd27827@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28a01a8a-77d2-dcdc-eda4-a6ff7c7b54c0@gmail.com>

On 2/16/23 8:42 AM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>>> @@ -638,6 +647,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union 
>>> bpf_attr *attr)
>>>       set_vm_flush_reset_perms(st_map->image);
>>>       bpf_map_init_from_attr(map, attr);
>>> +    map->map_flags |= attr->map_flags & BPF_F_LINK;
>>
>> This should have already been done in bpf_map_init_from_attr().
> 
> bpf_map_init_from_attr() will filter out all flags except BPF_F_RDONLY & 
> BPF_F_WRONLY.

should be the opposite:

static u32 bpf_map_flags_retain_permanent(u32 flags)
{
	/* Some map creation flags are not tied to the map object but
          * rather to the map fd instead, so they have no meaning upon
          * map object inspection since multiple file descriptors with
          * different (access) properties can exist here. Thus, given
          * this has zero meaning for the map itself, lets clear these
          * from here.
          */
	return flags & ~(BPF_F_RDONLY | BPF_F_WRONLY);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-16 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14 22:17 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  0:26   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15  2:39   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:04     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:44       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 20:24         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 21:28           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:30       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-15 20:55         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  9:32   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15 22:58   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 17:59     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  2:43   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:15     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Register and unregister a struct_ops by their bpf_links Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  2:53   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:29     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16  0:37   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 16:42     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:38       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-02-17 22:17         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15  2:58   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 18:44     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-15 18:48       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 22:20         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:40   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-16 22:59     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-18  0:05     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18  1:08       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16  1:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-16 19:17     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 19:40       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18  0:22     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-18  1:10       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-21 22:20         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-14 22:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Kui-Feng Lee
2023-02-16 22:50   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-02-18  0:23     ` Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64d1219c-3d07-733a-17cc-17bb8fd27827@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.