From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38330 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbdFPPyd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:54:33 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20170616154959.GA27209@infradead.org> References: <20170616154959.GA27209@infradead.org> <20170616090621.GA13775@infradead.org> <149745330648.10897.9605870130502083184.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <149745338248.10897.17175227466711674034.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20170615093927.GG31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <9141.1497624810@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro , mszeredi@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:54:30 +0100 Message-ID: <654.1497628470@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Hellwig wrote: > (1) Add a new SB field that is like s_flags but for the new flags, Do we really need to do that? The SB_* flags are conumeric with the MS_* flags they replace. David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dhowells@redhat.com (David Howells) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:54:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5] In-Reply-To: <20170616154959.GA27209@infradead.org> References: <20170616154959.GA27209@infradead.org> <20170616090621.GA13775@infradead.org> <149745330648.10897.9605870130502083184.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <149745338248.10897.17175227466711674034.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20170615093927.GG31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <9141.1497624810@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Message-ID: <654.1497628470@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > (1) Add a new SB field that is like s_flags but for the new flags, Do we really need to do that? The SB_* flags are conumeric with the MS_* flags they replace. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html