From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com, wqu@suse.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 14:43:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6540456.ZgMnpaWDUL@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158124801131151@kroah.com>
Dear Greg,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org - 09.02.20, 12:33:31 CET:
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git
> commit id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
I believe you tried to apply it twice, since it is already in 5.5.2.
Best,
Martin
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:31:05 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available
> space
>
> There was some logic added a while ago to clear out f_bavail in
> statfs() if we did not have enough free metadata space to satisfy our
> global reserve. This was incorrect at the time, however didn't
> really pose a problem for normal file systems because we would often
> allocate chunks if we got this low on free metadata space, and thus
> wouldn't really hit this case unless we were actually full.
>
> Fast forward to today and now we are much better about not allocating
> metadata chunks all of the time. Couple this with d792b0f19711
> ("btrfs: always reserve our entire size for the global reserve")
> which now means we'll easily have a larger global reserve than our
> free space, we are now more likely to trip over this while still
> having plenty of space.
>
> Fix this by skipping this logic if the global rsv's space_info is not
> full. space_info->full is 0 unless we've attempted to allocate a
> chunk for that space_info and that has failed. If this happens then
> the space for the global reserve is definitely sacred and we need to
> report b_avail == 0, but before then we can just use our calculated
> b_avail.
>
> Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
> Fixes: ca8a51b3a979 ("btrfs: statfs: report zero available if metadata
> are exhausted") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5+
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Tested-By: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index a906315efd19..0616a5434793 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -2135,7 +2135,15 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry,
> struct kstatfs *buf) */
> thresh = SZ_4M;
>
> - if (!mixed && total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
> + /*
> + * We only want to claim there's no available space if we can no
> longer + * allocate chunks for our metadata profile and our
global
> reserve will + * not fit in the free metadata space. If we aren't
> ->full then we + * still can allocate chunks and thus are fine using
> the currently + * calculated f_bavail.
> + */
> + if (!mixed && block_rsv->space_info->full &&
> + total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
> buf->f_bavail = 0;
>
> buf->f_type = BTRFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
--
Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-09 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-09 11:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree gregkh
2020-02-09 13:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2020-02-09 13:26 ` Greg KH
2020-02-09 15:59 ` Sasha Levin
2020-02-09 17:02 ` Greg KH
2020-02-09 13:43 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6540456.ZgMnpaWDUL@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.