From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: phy: correctly check soft_reset ret ONLY if defined for PHY
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:50:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <655bb7e5.5d0a0220.59243.9a2c@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120094234.1aae153e@kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 09:42:34AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:15:40 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Luckly nothing was ever added before the soft_reset call so the ret
> > check (in the case where a PHY didn't had soft_reset defined) although
> > wrong, never caused problems as ret was init 0 at the start of
> > phy_init_hw.
>
> not currently a bug => no Fixes tag, please
I know it's not a bug but still the referenced commit was wrong. Can I
at least use Ref to reference it?
Due to the changes done to this function, it's hard to catch where the
problem arised with a git blame.
--
Ansuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 13:15 [net-next PATCH] net: phy: correctly check soft_reset ret ONLY if defined for PHY Christian Marangi
2023-11-20 17:15 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-20 16:49 ` Christian Marangi
2023-11-21 9:09 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-20 17:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-20 16:50 ` Christian Marangi [this message]
2023-11-20 21:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=655bb7e5.5d0a0220.59243.9a2c@mx.google.com \
--to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.