From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <longman@redhat.com>, <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <vschneid@redhat.com>,
<tj@kernel.org>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <mkoutny@suse.com>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<jstultz@google.com>, <qyousef@layalina.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Flatten the pick
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:07:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65980119-a26a-40d6-bec8-dd597833a6e8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605105513.354837583@infradead.org>
Hello Peter,
On 6/5/2026 6:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Can also be had:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/flat
Here are early performance numbers at commit 7eb85c33dd20 ("sched/eevdf:
Move to a single runqueue").
tl;dr
Apart form a regression in the tbench and schbench at super high
utilization, all numbers for concur mode looks good so 7.2-rc1 target
should be good.
P.S. I won't be able to look into this until Thursday; Sorry in
advance.
Note: I haven't gotten around to analyzing anything in depth; These are
just early numbers on microbenchmarks and DeathStarBench. Please take
them with a grain of salt.
tip was at commit f666241e6bd5 ("sched/fair: Unify cfs_rq throttling via
account_cfs_rq_runtime()") and each label are the individual cgroup
mode togged on at queue:sched/flat:
Machine:
o 4th Generation EPYC system (Zen4c)
o 2 x 128C/256T (32LLCs)
o Boost enabled
o C2 disabled; MWAIT based C1 and POLL remained enabled
Benchmark numbers:
==================================================================
Test : hackbench
Units : Normalized time in seconds
Interpretation: Lower is better
Statistic : AMean
==================================================================
Case: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1-groups 1.00 [ -0.00](11.18) 1.01 [ -0.60](12.84) 1.12 [-12.08](12.50) 1.16 [-15.71]( 9.46) 1.07 [ -7.25](11.46) 0.99 [ 1.21](15.44)
2-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 4.73) 1.01 [ -1.00]( 9.29) 2.88 [-188.25](63.11) 0.97 [ 2.75](11.62) 0.95 [ 5.00](12.47) 0.96 [ 4.00](11.72)
4-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.90) 0.99 [ 0.96]( 2.48) 0.99 [ 0.72]( 2.38) 1.00 [ 0.48]( 1.78) 0.99 [ 0.96]( 6.61) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.23)
8-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.82) 1.03 [ -2.51]( 2.81) 0.99 [ 0.91]( 3.33) 0.99 [ 0.91]( 2.40) 1.01 [ -0.68]( 2.44) 1.02 [ -1.60]( 2.45)
16-groups 1.00 [ -0.00]( 3.05) 1.03 [ -2.96]( 1.97) 1.23 [-22.82](22.67) 1.01 [ -1.31]( 2.03) 0.99 [ 0.99]( 2.48) 1.01 [ -0.66]( 2.76)
Note: For smp variant runs, I think there was some system noise form
an unrelated job that stated by mistake. I have to go back and
rerun to confirm if the regression holds.
==================================================================
Test : tbench
Units : Normalized throughput
Interpretation: Higher is better
Statistic : AMean
==================================================================
Clients: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.23) 1.02 [ 1.53]( 0.10) 1.02 [ 1.80]( 0.96) 1.00 [ 0.19]( 0.17) 0.99 [ -0.58]( 0.18) 1.01 [ 1.13]( 0.18)
2 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.11) 1.01 [ 1.13]( 0.04) 1.01 [ 1.26]( 0.08) 1.00 [ -0.12]( 0.21) 0.99 [ -1.00]( 0.29) 1.01 [ 0.51]( 0.02)
4 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.11) 1.01 [ 1.30]( 0.16) 1.02 [ 2.26]( 0.48) 1.00 [ 0.06]( 0.37) 0.99 [ -0.74]( 0.52) 1.01 [ 1.35]( 0.35)
8 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.24) 1.01 [ 1.19]( 0.81) 1.02 [ 2.17]( 0.52) 1.00 [ 0.45]( 0.36) 0.99 [ -0.80]( 0.05) 1.01 [ 0.92]( 0.39)
16 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.01 [ 0.87]( 0.70) 1.03 [ 2.56]( 0.18) 1.00 [ -0.41]( 0.46) 0.99 [ -0.99]( 0.36) 1.01 [ 0.55]( 1.02)
32 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.02) 1.02 [ 2.42]( 0.36) 1.04 [ 3.76]( 0.94) 1.01 [ 1.20]( 0.19) 1.00 [ -0.10]( 0.44) 1.02 [ 1.61]( 0.27)
64 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.36) 1.02 [ 1.92]( 1.71) 1.03 [ 2.59]( 1.15) 0.99 [ -0.51]( 0.88) 1.01 [ 1.19]( 0.29) 1.02 [ 2.42]( 0.57)
128 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.45) 1.01 [ 1.11]( 1.37) 1.05 [ 4.64]( 1.05) 1.01 [ 0.98]( 2.47) 1.01 [ 0.84]( 1.97) 1.03 [ 2.56]( 1.22)
256 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.06) 1.02 [ 2.23]( 1.11) 1.02 [ 2.17]( 0.69) 1.03 [ 2.87]( 0.46) 1.03 [ 2.57]( 0.41) 1.03 [ 2.99]( 0.84)
512 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.50) 0.92 [ -7.62]( 6.42) 1.02 [ 1.94]( 2.12) 1.01 [ 0.74]( 6.70) 0.94 [ -6.09]( 5.19) 0.98 [ -2.40]( 3.00)
1024 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.07) 0.98 [ -1.51]( 0.30) 1.02 [ 1.66]( 0.13) 0.97 [ -2.97]( 0.76) 0.94 [ -6.33]( 0.26) 0.95 [ -4.63]( 0.47)
2048 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.25) 0.98 [ -1.57]( 0.59) 1.02 [ 1.81]( 0.20) 0.98 [ -1.94]( 0.38) 0.94 [ -5.54]( 0.17) 0.95 [ -4.56]( 0.77)
==================================================================
Test : stream-10
Units : Normalized Bandwidth, MB/s
Interpretation: Higher is better
Statistic : HMean
==================================================================
Test: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
Copy 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.51) 0.92 [ -7.61](12.64) 0.99 [ -0.79]( 0.30) 0.85 [-15.33](21.73) 0.99 [ -0.61]( 0.35) 0.99 [ -0.90]( 0.38)
Scale 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.35) 0.90 [ -9.96](14.86) 0.99 [ -1.45]( 0.76) 0.85 [-14.73](21.14) 0.99 [ -1.12]( 0.86) 0.99 [ -1.13]( 0.71)
Add 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.21) 0.93 [ -6.95](10.26) 0.98 [ -1.51]( 0.80) 0.95 [ -4.91]( 9.84) 0.99 [ -0.98]( 0.69) 0.99 [ -1.37]( 0.67)
Triad 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.24) 0.89 [-10.61](15.55) 0.99 [ -1.46]( 0.72) 0.95 [ -4.87]( 9.50) 0.99 [ -0.90]( 0.62) 0.99 [ -1.44]( 0.61)
==================================================================
Test : stream-100
Units : Normalized Bandwidth, MB/s
Interpretation: Higher is better
Statistic : HMean
==================================================================
Test: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
Copy 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.52) 1.00 [ -0.16]( 0.56) 0.97 [ -2.54]( 2.30) 1.00 [ 0.09]( 0.18) 1.00 [ 0.17]( 0.44) 0.99 [ -0.74]( 1.49)
Scale 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.43) 0.99 [ -0.63]( 0.55) 0.97 [ -2.72]( 2.44) 1.00 [ 0.20]( 0.16) 0.99 [ -0.67]( 0.43) 0.99 [ -1.39]( 1.45)
Add 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.06) 0.99 [ -1.27]( 0.42) 0.97 [ -3.08]( 1.95) 1.00 [ -0.13]( 0.19) 0.99 [ -1.19]( 0.34) 0.98 [ -1.76]( 1.07)
Triad 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.10) 0.98 [ -1.55]( 0.41) 0.97 [ -3.40]( 1.95) 1.00 [ -0.42]( 0.16) 0.99 [ -1.49]( 0.35) 0.98 [ -2.08]( 1.11)
==================================================================
Test : netperf
Units : Normalized Througput
Interpretation: Higher is better
Statistic : AMean
==================================================================
Clients: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.02 [ 2.24]( 0.12) 1.02 [ 1.50]( 0.22) 1.07 [ 6.86]( 2.15) 1.00 [ 0.27]( 0.45) 1.02 [ 1.86]( 0.15)
2-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.37) 1.03 [ 2.50]( 0.80) 1.03 [ 3.11]( 0.78) 1.07 [ 7.15]( 0.96) 1.00 [ -0.43]( 0.54) 1.02 [ 1.67]( 0.69)
4-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.26) 1.02 [ 2.26]( 0.33) 1.02 [ 2.02]( 0.37) 1.07 [ 7.37]( 0.78) 1.00 [ -0.24]( 0.42) 1.02 [ 1.84]( 0.22)
8-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.21) 1.02 [ 2.47]( 0.55) 1.02 [ 2.13]( 0.48) 1.08 [ 7.60]( 0.57) 1.00 [ -0.15]( 0.37) 1.02 [ 1.87]( 0.29)
16-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.23) 1.02 [ 2.07]( 0.69) 1.02 [ 1.87]( 0.42) 1.07 [ 7.38]( 0.50) 0.99 [ -0.55]( 0.48) 1.02 [ 1.78]( 0.25)
32-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.47) 1.02 [ 2.14]( 0.63) 1.02 [ 1.81]( 0.75) 1.07 [ 7.44]( 0.94) 1.00 [ -0.38]( 0.53) 1.02 [ 1.76]( 0.43)
64-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.91) 1.02 [ 2.00]( 0.81) 1.02 [ 1.74]( 0.96) 1.07 [ 7.12]( 1.06) 1.00 [ -0.20]( 0.68) 1.02 [ 1.63]( 0.76)
128-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.19) 1.01 [ 1.36]( 1.28) 1.01 [ 1.34]( 1.18) 1.06 [ 6.37]( 1.47) 1.00 [ -0.49]( 1.15) 1.01 [ 1.06]( 1.09)
256-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.00) 1.02 [ 1.70]( 1.15) 1.02 [ 1.64]( 1.18) 1.07 [ 7.17]( 1.87) 1.00 [ -0.31]( 1.19) 1.01 [ 1.29]( 1.12)
512-clients 1.00 [ 0.00]( 5.16) 1.00 [ 0.02]( 6.48) 0.99 [ -0.60]( 4.31) 1.04 [ 4.08]( 3.83) 1.00 [ 0.02]( 2.52) 1.00 [ 0.48]( 2.86)
768-clients 1.00 [ 0.00](34.61) 1.03 [ 2.84](62.48) 1.00 [ 0.26](30.91) 0.98 [ -2.12](13.41) 0.94 [ -6.34](11.15) 0.95 [ -4.82](10.61)
1024-clients 1.00 [ 0.00](41.78) 1.04 [ 3.95](76.45) 1.01 [ 0.99](40.23) 0.97 [ -2.58](11.79) 0.95 [ -5.36](11.21) 0.96 [ -4.01](12.98)
==================================================================
Test : schbench
Units : Normalized 99th percentile latency in us
Interpretation: Lower is better
Statistic : Median
==================================================================
#workers: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.88) 0.94 [ 5.88](19.25) 0.88 [ 11.76]( 7.37) 0.88 [ 11.76](34.02) 1.06 [ -5.88](11.11) 0.94 [ 5.88]( 3.69)
2 1.00 [ -0.00](36.56) 0.97 [ 3.03]( 9.52) 0.97 [ 3.03]( 4.82) 1.00 [ -0.00](26.93) 0.97 [ 3.03](14.53) 0.82 [ 18.18](13.87)
4 1.00 [ -0.00]( 9.35) 0.97 [ 3.12](18.25) 0.94 [ 6.25]( 9.12) 1.00 [ -0.00](20.82) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 4.82) 0.88 [ 12.50](15.93)
8 1.00 [ -0.00](23.38) 0.94 [ 6.45](23.26) 1.26 [-25.81](14.43) 1.26 [-25.81](26.13) 1.06 [ -6.45]( 4.68) 0.97 [ 3.23](10.00)
16 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.71) 1.04 [ -3.57]( 2.62) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.04) 0.98 [ 1.79]( 2.76) 1.04 [ -3.57]( 0.00) 1.02 [ -1.79]( 2.70)
32 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.72) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.72) 0.96 [ 3.75]( 1.30) 1.01 [ -1.25]( 0.71) 1.01 [ -1.25]( 1.88) 1.02 [ -2.50]( 1.86)
64 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.52) 0.96 [ 4.41]( 1.18) 0.97 [ 2.94]( 4.49) 0.94 [ 5.88]( 1.19) 0.95 [ 5.15]( 0.45) 0.96 [ 4.41]( 0.45)
128 1.00 [ -0.00]( 3.24) 0.96 [ 3.80]( 0.91) 0.96 [ 3.80]( 1.53) 0.95 [ 4.64]( 0.26) 0.96 [ 3.80]( 0.44) 0.97 [ 2.53]( 1.32)
256 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.90) 0.92 [ 7.60]( 0.75) 0.95 [ 5.40]( 0.61) 0.92 [ 7.80]( 0.55) 0.93 [ 6.60]( 6.23) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.61)
512 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.76) 1.10 [-10.36]( 0.48) 1.04 [ -4.15]( 1.46) 0.97 [ 3.45]( 7.07) 1.07 [ -6.56]( 2.54) 0.93 [ 6.56]( 2.45)
768 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.79) 0.95 [ 5.10]( 6.65) 1.71 [-70.87]( 4.67) 0.80 [ 20.13]( 1.81) 0.78 [ 21.80]( 1.19) 0.78 [ 22.36]( 1.46)
1024 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.86) 0.35 [ 64.79](18.07) 1.16 [-15.56]( 1.17) 1.00 [ 0.32]( 3.65) 0.95 [ 4.54]( 3.10) 0.90 [ 9.72]( 2.33)
==================================================================
Test : new-schbench-requests-per-second
Units : Normalized Requests per second
Interpretation: Higher is better
Statistic : Median
==================================================================
#workers: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.30]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.30]( 0.31) 0.99 [ -0.59]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00)
2 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.30]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.61) 1.00 [ 0.30]( 0.15) 1.00 [ -0.30]( 0.70) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.61)
4 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.30) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.29]( 0.15) 0.99 [ -0.59]( 0.31)
8 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.29]( 0.15)
16 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.00 [ -0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.29]( 0.15)
32 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.15)
64 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.15) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.29]( 0.15)
128 1.00 [ 0.00](17.05) 1.01 [ 0.59](14.45) 1.00 [ 0.30]( 0.00) 1.01 [ 0.59](10.49) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 9.79) 1.00 [ 0.30]( 0.31)
256 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.59) 1.00 [ 0.28]( 0.59) 1.00 [ 0.28]( 0.44) 1.00 [ -0.28]( 0.82) 0.99 [ -0.57]( 0.39) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.67)
512 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.69) 1.01 [ 1.50]( 1.66) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.33) 0.99 [ -1.50]( 0.39) 0.99 [ -1.12]( 0.58) 1.00 [ 0.00]( 0.78)
768 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.13) 1.12 [ 11.51]( 9.06) 0.99 [ -1.15]( 0.21) 0.91 [ -8.52]( 0.47) 0.91 [ -8.98]( 0.47) 0.93 [ -6.67]( 0.84)
1024 1.00 [ 0.00]( 1.23) 1.12 [ 12.41]( 4.32) 1.01 [ 1.10]( 0.71) 0.87 [-13.24]( 0.59) 0.87 [-12.97]( 0.49) 0.86 [-14.07]( 0.00)
==================================================================
Test : new-schbench-wakeup-latency
Units : Normalized 99th percentile latency in us
Interpretation: Lower is better
Statistic : Median
==================================================================
#workers: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1 1.00 [ -0.00](21.48) 2.75 [-175.00](14.06) 3.00 [-200.00](12.91) 3.62 [-262.50](29.64) 3.62 [-262.50](21.84) 2.25 [-125.00](12.45)
2 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.96) 1.33 [-33.33](24.78) 1.33 [-33.33](18.25) 1.11 [-11.11](25.37) 1.11 [-11.11]( 9.68) 1.11 [-11.11]( 5.00)
4 1.00 [ -0.00]( 6.20) 1.38 [-37.50]( 4.84) 1.12 [-12.50]( 0.00) 1.25 [-25.00](21.51) 1.12 [-12.50](19.99) 1.38 [-37.50](12.81)
8 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.34) 1.20 [-20.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.00) 1.20 [-20.00]( 7.45) 1.20 [-20.00]( 0.00) 1.20 [-20.00]( 4.19)
16 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.53) 1.22 [-22.22]( 0.00) 1.11 [-11.11]( 0.00) 1.11 [-11.11]( 9.68) 1.33 [-33.33]( 0.00) 1.33 [-33.33]( 4.43)
32 1.00 [ -0.00]( 5.53) 1.11 [-11.11]( 5.00) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 1.11 [-11.11]( 5.00) 1.11 [-11.11]( 0.00) 1.11 [-11.11]( 0.00)
64 1.00 [ -0.00](12.81) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 0.91 [ 9.09]( 5.34) 0.91 [ 9.09]( 5.00) 0.91 [ 9.09]( 5.00) 0.82 [ 18.18](10.68)
128 1.00 [ -0.00](12.14) 1.12 [-12.50]( 4.97) 0.81 [ 18.75](13.62) 1.06 [ -6.25]( 5.26) 0.94 [ 6.25](14.68) 0.81 [ 18.75]( 6.88)
256 1.00 [ -0.00]( 4.83) 0.98 [ 1.90]( 7.97) 0.98 [ 2.37]( 2.41) 0.95 [ 4.74]( 5.31) 0.95 [ 5.21]( 3.25) 0.97 [ 2.84]( 2.84)
512 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 0.98 [ 2.00]( 5.86) 0.96 [ 3.99]( 1.61) 0.83 [ 16.83]( 1.08) 0.85 [ 14.84]( 7.53) 0.97 [ 3.42]( 7.91)
768 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.71) 0.96 [ 3.63](14.27) 0.96 [ 3.73]( 1.19) 0.67 [ 32.98]( 0.00) 0.67 [ 32.98]( 0.00) 0.67 [ 32.98]( 0.15)
1024 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.55) 0.85 [ 14.99](14.23) 0.98 [ 1.80]( 0.82) 0.79 [ 21.29]( 0.00) 0.79 [ 21.29]( 0.00) 0.79 [ 21.29]( 0.00)
==================================================================
Test : new-schbench-request-latency
Units : Normalized 99th percentile latency in us
Interpretation: Lower is better
Statistic : Median
==================================================================
#workers: tip[pct imp](CV) up[pct imp](CV) smp[pct imp](CV) max[pct imp](CV) concur[pct imp](CV) tasks[pct imp](CV)
1 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.14) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.14) 1.00 [ -0.26]( 0.27) 1.01 [ -0.53]( 0.27) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.14)
2 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.26]( 0.14) 1.02 [ -2.36]( 1.51) 0.99 [ 0.52]( 0.14) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.00) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.74)
4 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ 0.26]( 1.82) 1.03 [ -2.63]( 0.23) 0.99 [ 0.53]( 0.14) 1.00 [ -0.26]( 1.61) 1.03 [ -3.42]( 1.79)
8 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.14) 0.99 [ 0.79]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 0.99 [ 1.05]( 0.14) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.00)
16 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.14) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 1.16) 1.00 [ -0.26]( 1.28) 0.99 [ 0.79]( 1.97) 1.00 [ -0.26]( 0.00) 1.02 [ -2.38]( 1.15)
32 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.23) 0.99 [ 1.04]( 0.24) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.67) 0.99 [ 1.04]( 0.14) 0.99 [ 0.52]( 0.49) 0.99 [ 1.30]( 0.95)
64 1.00 [ -0.00](12.39) 1.72 [-71.69](26.18) 1.01 [ -1.29](28.90) 0.97 [ 3.09]( 0.27) 0.98 [ 2.06]( 0.41) 0.98 [ 2.32]( 1.22)
128 1.00 [ -0.00]( 4.75) 0.98 [ 2.07](12.01) 0.99 [ 0.59]( 0.41) 1.00 [ 0.30]( 3.02) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.72) 0.99 [ 0.59]( 0.77)
256 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.13) 0.99 [ 0.76]( 0.13) 1.00 [ -0.00]( 0.13) 0.99 [ 0.76]( 0.00) 0.99 [ 0.51]( 0.13) 0.99 [ 0.51]( 0.13)
512 1.00 [ -0.00]( 7.49) 1.04 [ -4.36](28.15) 0.89 [ 10.50]( 4.15) 0.42 [ 57.93]( 9.03) 0.48 [ 52.23](25.18) 0.71 [ 28.83](25.82)
768 1.00 [ -0.00]( 3.13) 1.31 [-31.19](10.91) 1.10 [-10.13]( 1.12) 0.71 [ 28.69]( 3.69) 0.70 [ 29.59]( 3.58) 0.84 [ 15.65]( 4.74)
1024 1.00 [ -0.00]( 2.28) 1.44 [-44.48](16.05) 1.13 [-13.09]( 0.88) 0.85 [ 15.39]( 6.64) 0.85 [ 15.03]( 0.39) 0.81 [ 19.39]( 1.36)
---
DeathStarBench was run on a 3rd Generation EPYC system (2 x 64C/128T)
with boost enabled and C2 disabled:
==================================================================
Test : DeathStarBench
Units : %diff compared to tip
Interpretation: Higher is better
Statistic : Average throughput
==================================================================
Scaling\cg_mode up smp max concur tasks
2x 1.63% -0.32% -0.03% -0.65% 0.62%
4x -4.94% 1.38% -6.59% 1.09% -6.11%
6x 1.83% 0.16% -0.87% 2.24% -0.23%
---
I'll get to look any deeper into any of the regressions until Thursday
but overall the concur mode seems good in my testing for most part.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 12:40 [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Flatten the pick Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode switch Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: up Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: max Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 15:09 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-10 15:42 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-11 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-11 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-11 20:57 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: concur Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: tasks Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] sched/fair: Change the default cgroup_mode to concur Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-05 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-20 3:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-26 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-29 14:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Fix overflow in update_tg_cfs_runnable() tip-bot2 for Chen, Yu C
2026-06-30 9:03 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2026-06-09 5:37 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-06-12 2:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Flatten the pick Shubhang Kaushik
2026-08-17 16:05 ` Szabina Korbai
2026-08-17 16:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-18 9:04 ` Szabina Korbai
2026-08-18 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-21 10:37 ` Szabina Korbai
2026-08-24 14:51 ` Chen Yu
2026-08-24 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65980119-a26a-40d6-bec8-dd597833a6e8@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.