From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:44:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65a8fa25-0c14-4251-ad22-8f4b31be0d4e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afd4adf1-5220-40ff-816e-da588b74fadc@intel.com>
On 11/1/2024 2:21 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 29/10/2024 12:01, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h so this can be used in other
>> places without needing keep the same comment about removal of this WA
>> in the future. The WA, which flushes work or workqueues, is now wrapped
>> in macros and can be reused wherever needed.
>>
>> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.11+
>> Suggested-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Thanks for reviewing the series, Matt!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 12:01 [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/ufence: Flush xe ordered_wq in case of ufence timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:49 ` John Harrison
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/guc/tlb: Flush g2h worker in case of tlb timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:19 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:51 ` John Harrison
2024-11-04 11:20 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 14:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:13 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:14 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 17:47 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-01 13:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 13:44 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-11-01 15:47 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-11-01 18:48 ` John Harrison
2024-11-04 9:52 ` Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65a8fa25-0c14-4251-ad22-8f4b31be0d4e@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.