From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edmundo Carmona Subject: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail? Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:04:52 -0400 Message-ID: <65aa6af905072108048be6c7d@mail.gmail.com> References: <65aa6af905072021501603cfd5@mail.gmail.com> <42DF85AE.1000400@gmx.co.uk> <65aa6af905072107063ebab0bc@mail.gmail.com> <65aa6af9050721071866e3c73b@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Edmundo Carmona Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Oh, I think I see what you mean. That multipath thing is driving me crazy, man. I just tested what Jozsef told us, that there's a routing decision right after output if something changed in the packet. He is so right! I marked a packet in the output mangle, and it was routed according to that mark. Thank you, Jozsef! On 7/21/05, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >=20 > >>> I think it's because they're both on the same network. > >> > >> Load balancing using route path cost and tc is done on a per-device ba= sis; > > > >Oh, ok. Good! (I need a translator!). > >What do you mean? I didn't get it. (I'm kind of ashamed :-)). >=20 > If you do load balancing / traffic shaping using iptables, you operate on= a > per-packet or per-connection basis (depending on what you do) >=20 > If you do load balancing with /sbin/route, you operate at the device leve= l. > If you do traffic shaping with /sbin/tc, you operate at the device level. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Jan Engelhardt > -- >