From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edmundo Carmona Subject: Re: is this the zillionth mail asking for this detail? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: <65aa6af90508110806ea3380e@mail.gmail.com> References: <65aa6af905072021501603cfd5@mail.gmail.com> <65aa6af905072107096e1d6d06@mail.gmail.com> <65aa6af9050810083761c164a8@mail.gmail.com> <200508101511.50410.rob0@gmx.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200508101511.50410.rob0@gmx.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org I know the routing decision has been made.... but I thought there could be a second routing decision... just like OUTPUT (there will be a second routing decision if some properties from the packet were mangled... or natted). On 8/10/05, /dev/rob0 wrote: > [ top-posting fixed ] > On Wednesday 2005-August-10 10:37, Edmundo Carmona wrote: > > On 7/21/05, Edmundo Carmona wrote: > > > > But for the record: for locally generated packets the routing > > > > engine is called after OUTPUT only if source address, destination > > > > address, nfmark field or tos of the skbuff changed. So it's not > > > > called blindly for every packet. >=20 > > Sorry to reply on an old thread.. but I think it's a good point to > > start my next questions. Does the same policy stand on FORWARD? There > > will be another routing decision if source address, destination > > address, nfmark field or tos of the skbuff changed??? >=20 > Of which FORWARD are you asking, filter or mangle? In either case I > think the routing decision has already been made. In neither case > (TTBOMK; I don't know much about mangle) can you change source and > destination IP addresses. Why would there be another routing decision? > -- > mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" > or "not-spam" is in Subject: header >=20 >