From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2)
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 22:48:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65f02bfc-6afd-4ce7-843d-15cfcd2edc94@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177520867238.430832.13504999596712780226@a3b018990fe9>
On 4/3/2026 11:31 AM, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2)
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164119/ <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164119/>
> *State:* failure
> *Details:* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/index.html <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/index.html>
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-4843-dba2251b00d3faac3be7fc15431ffb9c4d60232b_FULL -> xe-pw-164119v2_FULL
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-164119v2_FULL absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-164119v2_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
> Participating hosts (2 -> 2)
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-164119v2_FULL:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset:
> o shard-bmg: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-4843-dba2251b00d3faac3be7fc15431ffb9c4d60232b/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset.html> -> DMESG-WARN <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset.html> +2 other tests dmesg-warn
<3> [159.952583] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Tile0: GT1: G2H channel broken on read, type=3, reset required
<3> [160.155952] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Tile0: GT1: CT dequeue failed: -95
not directly related to this series, just exposes a gap in our CTB implementation
should be fixed by https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164357/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 19:17 [PATCH v2 00/13] drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/xe/guc: Update POLICY_SCHED_IF_IDLE documentation Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/xe/pf: Fix pf_get_sched_priority() function signature Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/xe/pf: Force new VFs prorities only once Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/xe/pf: Print applied policy KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/xe/pf: Reprovision policy settings after GT reset Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/xe/pf: Don't reprovision policies if already default Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/xe/pf: Encode scheduling priority KLV if needed Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/xe/pf: Check EQ/PT/PRIO when testing VF config Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/xe/pf: Allow to change sched_if_idle policy under lock Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/xe/pf: Reprovision scheduling to default when no VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/xe/pf: Extract helper to show which VFs are provisioned Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/xe/pf: Extract helpers for bulk EQ/PT provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/xe/pf: Perform fair scheduling auto-provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-03 11:37 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-04-02 19:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-02 20:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-03 9:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-03 20:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-04-11 15:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-11 16:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-11 18:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65f02bfc-6afd-4ce7-843d-15cfcd2edc94@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.