From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
"Álvaro Fernández Rojas" <noltari@gmail.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Daniel González Cabanelas" <dgcbueu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] bmips: dma: drop redundant boot_cpu_type in arch_dma_sync
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 21:39:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66353d60.050a0220.df862.761f@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4821338d-bae1-418e-b4a8-6218f62d74dd@broadcom.com>
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:07:45PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/3/24 06:54, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Drop redundant boot_cpu_type in arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_all. These needs
> > to be parsed only once and we can make use of bmips_rac_flush_disable to
> > disable RAC flush on unsupported CPU.
> >
> > Set this value in bmips_cpu_setup for unsupported CPU to skip this
> > redundant check every time DMA needs to be synced.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
>
> You are taking a shortcut that is reasonable in premise, but keying off the
> bmips_rac_flush_disable is IMHO misleading. The RAC is enabled in the
> BMIPS5000 and BMIPS5200 cores, just it does not need SW management unlike
> earlier cores.
>
> If you renamed it to bmips_rac_flush_needed that might be more compelling.
> Also, the other reason is that on a kernel that was configured for
> supporting only BMIPS5000 and BMIPS5200 CPUs, I think we could get some
> decent dead code elimination of the boot_cpu_type() check, which would not
> be the case.
I was a bit confused by the last part, should I drop this or just rename
the variable? Cause I think for kernel that support ONLY those CPU I
guess the DMA function will be optimized anyway since the bool will
always be false I guess?
--
Ansuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 13:54 [PATCH 0/6] mips: bmips: improve handling of RAC and CBR addr Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] mips: bmips: BCM6358: make sure CBR is correctly set Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] mips: bmips: rework and cache CBR addr handling Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: mips: brcm: Document mips-cbr-reg property Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 16:21 ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-03 19:33 ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 20:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 22:14 ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-05 16:05 ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] mips: bmips: setup: make CBR address configurable Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 19:09 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 19:35 ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 21:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 21:27 ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] mips: bmips: enable RAC on BMIPS4350 Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 18:56 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 21:11 ` Daniel González Cabanelas
2024-05-03 21:15 ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 21:34 ` Daniel González Cabanelas
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] bmips: dma: drop redundant boot_cpu_type in arch_dma_sync Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 13:56 ` Christian Marangi
2024-05-03 19:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 19:39 ` Christian Marangi [this message]
2024-05-03 20:08 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] mips: " Christian Marangi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66353d60.050a0220.df862.761f@mx.google.com \
--to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dgcbueu@gmail.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noltari@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.