Re: [PATCH v14] ath10k: add LED and GPIO controlling support for various chipsets

[Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 07:50:40AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Il giorno sab 17 giu 2023 alle ore 19:28 Christian Marangi
> > <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:35:04PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 08:03:23PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> > > Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> writes:
> >> > >
> >> > > > From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Adds LED and GPIO Control support for 988x, 9887, 9888, 99x0, 9984
> >> > > > based chipsets with on chipset connected led's using WMI Firmware API.
> >> > > > The LED device will get available named as "ath10k-phyX" at sysfs and
> >> > > > can be controlled with various triggers.
> >> > > > Adds also debugfs interface for gpio control.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com>
> >> > > > Reviewed-by: Steve deRosier <derosier@cal-sierra.com>
> >> > > > [kvalo: major reorg and cleanup]
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> >> > > > [ansuel: rebase and small cleanup]
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> >> > > > Tested-by: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de>
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > > this is a very old patch from 2018 that somehow was talked till 2020
> >> > > > with Kavlo asked to rebase and resubmit and nobody did.
> >> > > > So here we are in 2023 with me trying to finally have this upstream.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > A summarize of the situation.
> >> > > > - The patch is from years in OpenWRT. Used by anything that has ath10k
> >> > > >   card and a LED connected.
> >> > > > - This patch is also used by the fw variant from Candela Tech with no
> >> > > >   problem reported.
> >> > > > - It was pointed out that this caused some problem with ipq4019 SoC
> >> > > >   but the problem was actually caused by a different bug related to
> >> > > >   interrupts.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I honestly hope we can have this feature merged since it's really
> >> > > > funny to have something that was so near merge and jet still not
> >> > > > present and with devices not supporting this simple but useful
> >> > > > feature.
> >> > >
> >> > > Indeed, we should finally get this in. Thanks for working on it.
> >> > >
> >> > > I did some minor changes to the patch, they are in my pending branch:
> >> > >
> >> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=686464864538158f22842dc49eddea6fa50e59c1
> >> > >
> >> > > My comments below, please review my changes. No need to resend because
> >> > > of these.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> > very happy this is going further.
> >> >
> >> > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
> >> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
> >> > > > @@ -67,6 +67,23 @@ config ATH10K_DEBUGFS
> >> > > >
> >> > > >     If unsure, say Y to make it easier to debug problems.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +config ATH10K_LEDS
> >> > > > + bool "Atheros ath10k LED support"
> >> > > > + depends on ATH10K
> >> > > > + select MAC80211_LEDS
> >> > > > + select LEDS_CLASS
> >> > > > + select NEW_LEDS
> >> > > > + default y
> >> > > > + help
> >> > > > +   This option enables LEDs support for chipset LED pins.
> >> > > > +   Each pin is connected via GPIO and can be controlled using
> >> > > > +   WMI Firmware API.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +   The LED device will get available named as "ath10k-phyX" at sysfs and
> >> > > > +           can be controlled with various triggers.
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +   Say Y, if you have LED pins connected to the ath10k wireless card.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm not sure anymore if we should ask anything from the user, better to
> >> > > enable automatically if LED support is enabled in the kernel. So I
> >> > > simplified this to:
> >> > >
> >> > > config ATH10K_LEDS
> >> > >     bool
> >> > >     depends on ATH10K
> >> > >     depends on LEDS_CLASS=y || LEDS_CLASS=MAC80211
> >> > >     default y
> >> > >
> >> > > This follows what mt76 does:
> >> > >
> >> > > config MT76_LEDS
> >> > >     bool
> >> > >     depends on MT76_CORE
> >> > >     depends on LEDS_CLASS=y || MT76_CORE=LEDS_CLASS
> >> > >     default y
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > I remember there was the same discussion in a previous series. OK for me
> >> > for making this by default, only concern is any buildbot error (if any)
> >> >
> >> > Anyway OK for the change.
> >> >
> >> > > > @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ static const struct ath10k_hw_params
> >> > > > ath10k_hw_params_list[] = {
> >> > > >           .dev_id = QCA988X_2_0_DEVICE_ID,
> >> > > >           .bus = ATH10K_BUS_PCI,
> >> > > >           .name = "qca988x hw2.0",
> >> > > > +         .led_pin = 1,
> >> > > >           .patch_load_addr = QCA988X_HW_2_0_PATCH_LOAD_ADDR,
> >> > > >           .uart_pin = 7,
> >> > > >           .cc_wraparound_type = ATH10K_HW_CC_WRAP_SHIFTED_ALL,
> >> > >
> >> > > I prefer following the field order from struct ath10k_hw_params
> >> > > declaration and also setting fields explicitly to zero (even though
> >> > > there are gaps still) so I changed that for every entry.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the change, np for me.
> >> >
> >> > > > +int ath10k_leds_register(struct ath10k *ar)
> >> > > > +{
> >> > > > + int ret;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + if (ar->hw_params.led_pin == 0)
> >> > > > +         /* leds not supported */
> >> > > > +         return 0;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + snprintf(ar->leds.label, sizeof(ar->leds.label), "ath10k-%s",
> >> > > > +          wiphy_name(ar->hw->wiphy));
> >> > > > + ar->leds.wifi_led.active_low = 1;
> >> > > > + ar->leds.wifi_led.gpio = ar->hw_params.led_pin;
> >> > > > + ar->leds.wifi_led.name = ar->leds.label;
> >> > > > + ar->leds.wifi_led.default_state = LEDS_GPIO_DEFSTATE_KEEP;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + ar->leds.cdev.name = ar->leds.label;
> >> > > > + ar->leds.cdev.brightness_set_blocking = ath10k_leds_set_brightness_blocking;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > + /* FIXME: this assignment doesn't make sense as it's NULL, remove it? */
> >> > > > + ar->leds.cdev.default_trigger = ar->leds.wifi_led.default_trigger;
> >> > >
> >> > > But what to do with this FIXME?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > It was pushed by you in v13.
> >> >
> >> > I could be wrong but your idea was to prepare for future support of
> >> > other patch that would set the default_trigger to the mac80211 tpt.
> >> >
> >> > We might got both confused by default_trigger and default_state.
> >> > default_trigger is actually never set and is NULL (actually it's 0)
> >> >
> >> > We have other 2 patch that adds tpt rates for the mac80211 LED trigger
> >> > and set this trigger as the default one but honestly I would chose a
> >> > different implementation than hardcoding everything.
> >> >
> >> > If it's ok for you, I would drop the comment and the default_trigger and
> >> > I will send a follow-up patch to this adding DT support by using
> >> > led_classdev_register_ext and defining init_data.
> >> > (and this indirectly would permit better LED naming and defining of
> >> > default-trigger in DT)
> >> >
> >> > Also ideally I will also send a patch for default_state following
> >> > standard LED implementation. (to set default_state in DT)
> >> >
> >> > I would prefer this approach as the LED patch already took way too much
> >> > time and I think it's better to merge this initial version and then
> >> > improve it.
> >>
> >> If you want to check out I attached the 2 patch (one dt-bindings and the
> >> one for the code) that I will submit when this will be merged (the
> >> change is with the assumption that the FIXME line is dropped)
> >>
> >> Tested and works correctly with my use case of wifi card attached with
> >> pcie. This implementation permits to declare the default trigger in DT
> >> instead of hardcoding.
> >>
> >
> > Any news with this? Did I notice the LEDs patch are still in pending...
> 
> Sorry for the delay but finally I looked at this again. I decided to
> just remove the fixme and otherwise it looks good for me. Please check
> my changes:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=688130a66ed49f20ca0ce02c3987f6a474f7c93a
>

All ok for me, Just I notice the ATH10K_LEDS is not exposed anymore? Is
that intended?

Aside from this very happy that we are finally finishing with this long
lasting feature!

-- 
	Ansuel