All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Avoid python leak sanitizer test failures
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:17:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6645190c-e66f-49db-a23d-e08f6308a422@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240717165717.1315003-1-irogers@google.com>

Hi,


On 17/07/24 22:27, Ian Rogers wrote:

> Leak sanitizer will report memory leaks from python and the leak
> sanitizer output causes tests to fail. For example:
>
> ```
> $ perf test 98 -v
>   98: perf script tests:
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 1272962
> DB test
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.046 MB /tmp/perf-test-script.x0EktdCel8/perf.data (8 samples) ]
> call_path_table((1, 0, 0, 0)
> call_path_table((2, 1, 0, 140339508617447)
> call_path_table((3, 2, 2, 0)
> call_path_table((4, 3, 3, 0)
> call_path_table((5, 4, 4, 0)
> call_path_table((6, 5, 5, 0)
> call_path_table((7, 6, 6, 0)
> call_path_table((8, 7, 7, 0)
> call_path_table((9, 8, 8, 0)
> call_path_table((10, 9, 9, 0)
> call_path_table((11, 10, 10, 0)
> call_path_table((12, 11, 11, 0)
> call_path_table((13, 12, 1, 0)
> sample_table((1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954119000, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> sample_table((2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954137053, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> sample_table((3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954140089, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> sample_table((4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954142376, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 155, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> sample_table((5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954144045, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2493, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> sample_table((6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 12, 77, -2046828595, 588306954145722, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 47555, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> call_path_table((14, 9, 14, 0)
> call_path_table((15, 14, 15, 0)
> call_path_table((16, 15, 0, -1040969624)
> call_path_table((17, 16, 16, 0)
> call_path_table((18, 17, 17, 0)
> call_path_table((19, 18, 18, 0)
> call_path_table((20, 19, 19, 0)
> call_path_table((21, 20, 13, 0)
> sample_table((7, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 13, 46, -2053700898, 588306954157436, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 964078, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 21, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
> call_path_table((22, 1, 21, 0)
> call_path_table((23, 22, 22, 0)
> call_path_table((24, 23, 23, 0)
> call_path_table((25, 24, 24, 0)
> call_path_table((26, 25, 25, 0)
> call_path_table((27, 26, 26, 0)
> call_path_table((28, 27, 27, 0)
> call_path_table((29, 28, 28, 0)
> call_path_table((30, 29, 29, 0)
> call_path_table((31, 30, 30, 0)
> call_path_table((32, 31, 31, 0)
> call_path_table((33, 32, 32, 0)
> call_path_table((34, 33, 33, 0)
> call_path_table((35, 34, 20, 0)
> sample_table((8, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 20, 49, -2046878127, 588306954378624, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2534317, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 35, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
>
> =================================================================
> ==1272975==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
>
> Direct leak of 13628 byte(s) in 6 object(s) allocated from:
>      #0 0x56354f60c092 in malloc (/tmp/perf/perf+0x29c092)
>      #1 0x7ff25c7d02e7 in _PyObject_Malloc /build/python3.11/../Objects/obmalloc.c:2003:11
>      #2 0x7ff25c7d02e7 in _PyObject_Malloc /build/python3.11/../Objects/obmalloc.c:1996:1
>
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 13628 byte(s) leaked in 6 allocation(s).
> --- Cleaning up ---
> ---- end(-1) ----
>   98: perf script tests                                               : FAILED!
> ```
>
> Disable leak sanitizer when running specific perf+python tests to
> avoid this. This causes the tests to pass when run with leak
> sanitizer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh             | 3 +++
>   tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 3 +++
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh
> index c1a603653662..d3e2958d2242 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh
> @@ -61,7 +61,10 @@ _end_of_file_
>   	esac
>   
>   	perf record $cmd_flags -o "${perfdatafile}" true
> +	# Disable lsan to avoid warnings about python memory leaks.
> +	export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0
>   	perf script -i "${perfdatafile}" -s "${db_test}"
> +	export ASAN_OPTIONS=
>   	echo "DB test [Success]"
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> index 92d15154ba79..cb02bf23e6a5 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ if [ -e "$perfdir/scripts/python/Perf-Trace-Util" ]; then
>     export PERF_EXEC_PATH=$perfdir
>   fi
>   
> +# Disable lsan to avoid warnings about python memory leaks.
> +export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0
> +
>   cleanup() {
>     rm -f perf.data
>     rm -f perf.data.old

Looks good, and test passes with this patch:

Reviewed-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>


Linux-ci build test results: 
https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/linux-ci/actions?query=branch%3Atmp-test-branch-25073


Thanks,
Aditya Gupta


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-18  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-17 16:57 [PATCH v1] perf test: Avoid python leak sanitizer test failures Ian Rogers
2024-07-18  8:47 ` Aditya Gupta [this message]
2024-07-23 18:33   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6645190c-e66f-49db-a23d-e08f6308a422@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.