From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"Yuying Zhang" <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>,
Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:40:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66d9a4e1cded46f0aa2c1b9f3616667b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR08MB7718CEF322F2F1604CE228B0C8FFA@AS8PR08MB7718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Feifei,
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Feifei Wang
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 11:11 AM
> > > To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>; Konstantin
> > > Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > > Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei Xing
> > > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> > > <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 4, 2023 6:22 PM
> > > > To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; Konstantin Ananyev
> > > > <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > > > Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei Xing
> > > > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> > > > <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Define specific function implementation for i40e driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, mbufs recycle mode can support 128bit
> > > > > > > > > > > > vector path and
> > > > > > > > > > > > avx2
> > > > > > > > > > path.
> > > > > > > > > > > > And can be enabled both in fast free and no fast free mode.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > > > > > <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 1 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 2 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > .../net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c | 147
> > > > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 32 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h | 4 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 1 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 187 insertions(+) create mode
> > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index
> > > > > > > > > > > > 8271bbb394..50ba9aac94
> > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_eth_dev_ops
> > > > > > > > > > = {
> > > > > > > > > > > > .flow_ops_get = i40e_dev_flow_ops_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > .rxq_info_get = i40e_rxq_info_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > .txq_info_get = i40e_txq_info_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + .recycle_rxq_info_get =
> > > i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > .rx_burst_mode_get =
> > > i40e_rx_burst_mode_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > .tx_burst_mode_get =
> > > i40e_tx_burst_mode_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > .timesync_enable = i40e_timesync_enable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h index
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6f65d5e0ac..af758798e1
> > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1355,6 +1355,8 @@ void i40e_rxq_info_get(struct
> > > > > > > > > > > > rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > struct rte_eth_rxq_info *qinfo); void
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_txq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t
> > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > struct rte_eth_txq_info *qinfo);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +void i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > > > > > +*dev, uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info
> > > > > > > > > > > > +*recycle_rxq_info);
> > > > > > > > > > > > int i40e_rx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t
> > > > > > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > struct rte_eth_burst_mode *mode);
> > > int
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_tx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t queue_id, diff -- git
> > > > > > > > > > > > a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5663ecccde
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ .c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Arm Limited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include <stdint.h> #include <ethdev_driver.h>
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "base/i40e_prototype.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "base/i40e_type.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "i40e_ethdev.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "i40e_rxtx.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wcast-qual"
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +void
> > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec(void
> > > > > > > > > > > > +*rx_queue, uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > +nb_mbufs) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct i40e_rx_entry *rxep;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t rx_id;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint64_t paddr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint64_t dma_addr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t i;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxdp = rxq->rx_ring + rxq->rxrearm_start;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rxrearm_start];
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_mbufs; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Initialize rxdp descs. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + paddr = (rxep[i].mbuf)->buf_iova +
> > > > > > > > > > > > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dma_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(paddr);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = dma_addr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Update the descriptor initializer index */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxq->rxrearm_start += nb_mbufs;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rx_id = rxq->rxrearm_start - 1;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(rxq->rxrearm_start >= rxq->nb_rx_desc)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxq->rxrearm_start = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rx_id = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxq->rxrearm_nb -= nb_mbufs;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rte_io_wmb();
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec(void *tx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info *recycle_rxq_info) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct i40e_tx_queue *txq = tx_queue;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct rte_mbuf **rxep;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + int i, n;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t nb_recycle_mbufs;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t avail = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t mbuf_ring_size = recycle_rxq_info-
> > > >mbuf_ring_size;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t mask = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size - 1;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t refill_requirement = recycle_rxq_info-
> > > > > > > > >refill_requirement;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t refill_head = *recycle_rxq_info->refill_head;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + uint16_t receive_tail =
> > > > > > > > > > > > +*recycle_rxq_info->receive_tail;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Get available recycling Rx buffers. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + avail = (mbuf_ring_size - (refill_head -
> > > > > > > > > > > > +receive_tail)) & mask;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Check Tx free thresh and Rx available space. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (txq->nb_tx_free > txq->tx_free_thresh || avail
> > > > > > > > > > > > +<=
> > > > > > > > > > > > +txq-
> > > > > > > > >tx_rs_thresh)
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* check DD bits on threshold descriptor */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if
> > > > > > > > > > > > +((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz
> > > > > > > > > > > > +&
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + n = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + nb_recycle_mbufs = n;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Mbufs recycle mode can only support no ring
> > > > > > > > > > > > +buffer
> > > > > > > > wrapping
> > > > > > > > > > > > around.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * Two case for this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * case 1: The refill head of Rx buffer ring needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > +to be aligned
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * mbuf ring size. In this case, the number of Tx
> > > freeing buffers
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * should be equal to refill_requirement.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * case 2: The refill head of Rx ring buffer does
> > > > > > > > > > > > +not need to be
> > > > > > > > aligned
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * with mbuf ring size. In this case, the update
> > > > > > > > > > > > +of refill head
> > > > > > > > can not
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * exceed the Rx mbuf ring size.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (refill_requirement != n ||
> > > > > > > > > > > > + (!refill_requirement && (refill_head + n >
> > > > > > > > mbuf_ring_size)))
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* First buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1).
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n - 1)];
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxep = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxep += refill_head;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (txq->offloads &
> > > RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Avoid txq contains buffers from unexpected
> > > > > > > > mempool. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(recycle_rxq_info->mp
> > > > > > > > > > > > + != txep[0].mbuf-
> > > >pool))
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Directly put mbufs from Tx to Rx. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxep[i] = txep[i].mbuf;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxep[i] =
> > > > > > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* If Tx buffers are not the last
> > > reference or
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * unexpected mempool, previous
> > > copied
> > > > > > > > buffers are
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * considered as invalid.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely((rxep[i] == NULL &&
> > > > > > > > refill_requirement) ||
> > > > > > > > > > > [Konstantin]
> > > > > > > > > > > Could you pls remind me why it is ok to have
> > > > > > > > > > > rxep[i]==NULL when refill_requirement is not set?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If reill_requirement is not zero, it means each tx
> > > > > > > > > > > freed buffer must be valid and can be put into Rx sw_ring.
> > > > > > > > > > > Then the refill head of Rx buffer ring can be aligned
> > > > > > > > > > > with mbuf ring size. Briefly speaking the number
> > > > > > > > > > of Tx valid freed buffer must be equal to Rx refill_requirement.
> > > > > > > > > > For example, i40e driver.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If reill_requirement is zero, it means that the refill
> > > > > > > > > > > head of Rx buffer ring does not need to be aligned
> > > > > > > > > > > with mbuf ring size, thus if Tx have n valid freed
> > > > > > > > > > > buffers, we just need to put these n buffers into Rx
> > > > > > > > > > > sw-
> > > > > > > > > > ring, and not to be equal to the Rx setting rearm number.
> > > > > > > > > > For example, mlx5 driver.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion, above difference is due to pmd drivers
> > > > > > > > > > > have different
> > > > > > > > > > strategies to update their Rx rearm(refill) head.
> > > > > > > > > > > For i40e driver, if rearm_head exceed 1024, it will be
> > > > > > > > > > > set as
> > > > > > > > > > > 0 due to the
> > > > > > > > > > number of each rearm is a fixed value by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > For mlx5 driver. Its rearm_head can exceed 1024, and
> > > > > > > > > > > use mask to achieve
> > > > > > > > > > real index. Thus its rearm number can be a different value.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ok, but if rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf), it
> > > > > > > > > > means that this mbuf is not free yet and can't be reused.
> > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't we then set nb_recycle_mbufs = 0 in that case too?
> > > > > > > > > > Or probably would be enough to skip that mbuf?
> > > > > > > > > > Might be something like that:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > for (i = 0, j = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > rxep[j] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > > > > > > > > if (rxep[j] == NULL || recycle_rxq_info->mp !=
> > > > > > > > > > rxep[j].mbuf-
> > > > >pool)) {
> > > > > > > > > > if (refill_requirement) {
> > > > > > > > > > nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > break;
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > } else
> > > > > > > > > > j++;
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > /* now j contains actual number of recycled mbufs */
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info-
> > > >mp !=
> > > > > > > > txep[i].mbuf-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >pool))
> > > > > > > > > > > > + nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* If Tx buffers are not the last reference or
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * from unexpected mempool, all recycled
> > > buffers
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * are put into mempool.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (nb_recycle_mbufs == 0)
> > > > > > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (rxep[i] != NULL)
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > rte_mempool_put(rxep[i]-
> > > > > > > > >pool,
> > > > > > > > > > > > rxep[i]);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > [Konstantin] After another thought, it might be easier and
> > > > > > > > > cleaner
> > > > just to:
> > > > > > > > > if (rxep[j] == NULL || recycle_rxq_info->mp != rxep[j].mbuf->pool)
> > > > > > > > > nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Anyway, from my understanding - if
> > > > > > > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) returns NULL, then we can't
> > > > > > > > > recycle
> > > > that mbuf.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [Feifei] Agree with that 'rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf)
> > > > > > > > > returns NULL, then
> > > > > > > > we can't recycle that mbuf'.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Firstly, we should know for i40e driver, the number of
> > > > > > > > > free mbufs is fixed, it
> > > > > > > > must equal to 'tx_rs_thresh'
> > > > > > > > > This means if we start to free Tx mbufs, it cannot be
> > > > > > > > > interrupted until the
> > > > > > > > given amount of mbufs are freed.
> > > > > > > > > In the meanwhile, doing prefree operation for a Tx mbuf
> > > > > > > > > can be looked at this mbuf is freed from this TX sw-ring
> > > > > > > > > if the API returns NULL. This is due
> > > > > > > > to that call 'prefree_seg' function means update the mbuf refcnt.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So let's come back our recycle mbuf case.
> > > > > > > > > Here we consider that the case if we have 32 mbufs need to
> > > > > > > > > be freed, and
> > > > > > > > we firstly do the pre-free.
> > > > > > > > > And then first 8 mbufs is good and return value is not none.
> > > > > > > > > But the 9th
> > > > > > > > mbuf is bad, its refcnt is more than 1.
> > > > > > > > > So we just update its refcnt and cannot put it into Rx sw-ring.
> > > > > > > > > For Tx sw-ring,
> > > > > > > > this mbuf has been freed.
> > > > > > > > > Then we should continue to do pre-free operation for the
> > > > > > > > > next Tx mbufs to ensure the given amount of mbufs are freed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do a conclusion for this, this is because if we start to
> > > > > > > > > do pre-free operation, the Tx mbuf refcnt value maybe
> > > > > > > > > changed, so we cannot stop or
> > > > > > > > break until finish all the pre-free operation.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Finally, in the case that Rx refill_request is not zero,
> > > > > > > > > but the valid mbuf amount is less than this value, we must
> > > > > > > > > put back this Tx mbufs into
> > > > > > > > mempool.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Above is the reason why I do not directly jump out of the
> > > > > > > > > loop if some mbuf
> > > > > > > > return value is NULL.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yep, I already realized that it is a bit more complicated
> > > > > > > > and we need to continue with prefree() for all packets even
> > > > > > > > when we get NULL in
> > > > > > the middle.
> > > > > > > > Anyway the code has to be changed, right?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, I think for the code, it is unnecessary to be changed.
> > > > > > > For no fast free path, currently:
> > > > > > > 1. We check whether each mbuf is Ok and call pre_free function
> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > 2.1 For the mbuf return value is not NULL, it is put into Rx sw-ring.
> > > > > > > 2.2 For the mbuf return value is zero and refill-request, it
> > > > > > > will also firstly put into Rx sw-ring, and we set nb_recycle =
> > > > > > > 0
> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > 3.1 We check nb_recycle, if it is not 0, we will continue to
> > > > > > > rearm Rx descs
> > > > > > and update its index by call descs_refill function.
> > > > > > > 3.2 if nb_recycle is 0, we will put valid recycle mbufs back
> > > > > > > into mempool as general path. This is necessary, because we
> > > > > > > need to ensure the freed Tx number is fixed.(Some buffers
> > > > > > > return is null can be seen as freed, others need to be put
> > > > > > > into mempool)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or maybe I ignore something?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am talking about the case when both refill_requirement and
> > > > > > mbuf return values iare zero:
> > > > > > if (unlikely((rxep[i] == NULL && refill_requirement) || // ???
> > rxep[i]
> > > ==
> > > > 0
> > > > > > AND refill_requirement == 0 ???
> > > > > > recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> > > > > > nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As I can read the code you treat such situation as valid, while
> > > > > > I think we should reset nb_recycle_mbufs to zero when rxep[i] ==
> > > > > > NULL, no matter what value refill_requirement is.
> > > > >
> > > > > So this means for maybe MLX5 driver, its refill_request = 0. And
> > > > > if some mbufs return value is zero, the other mbufs can not be
> > > > > recycled into Rx sw-ring? Because nb_recycle=0, and they need to
> > > > > be put into
> > > > mempool.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think for such as MLX5 driver, we can allow recycle some valid
> > > > > mbufs into
> > > > Rx ring.
> > > > > Because no constraint for its refill number. Is my suggestion reasonable?
> > > >
> > > > I suppose yes: if refill_request is zero we potentially can skip 'bad'
> > > > mbufs and continue with recycling for remaining ones.
> > > > It would probably require more changes in current code, but sounds
> > > > ok to me in general.
> > > That's Ok. Thanks for your careful reviewing.
> >
> > I'm very sorry not to receive your e-mail and until now I realize we need to do
> > some code change for i40e driver. Also thanks ferruh to kindly remind this.
No worries at all and thanks for you and Ferruh fro fast reaction.
> >
> > Agree with you we need some operation for the case that (refill_requirement
> > == 0 && rxep[i] == 0).
> > Thus maybe we can do a change as follows:
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > rxep[0] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > if (unlikely((rxep[0] == NULL && refill_requirement) ||
> > recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> > nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > if (likely(rxep[0]))
> > rxep++;
> > }
> >
> > Is above change is Ok?
> >
>
> Just do a change for the above code:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> int j = 0;
> ......
>
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> rxep[j] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> if (unlikely(rxep[j] == NULL && !refill_requirement))
> continue;
> if (unlikely((rxep[j] == NULL && refill_requirement) ||
> recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> j++;
> }
>
> if (nb_recycle_mbufs == 0)
> for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
> if (rxep[i] != NULL)
> rte_mempool_put(rxep[i]->pool, rxep[i]);
> }
I think it should work...
One more thing, shouldn't we reset
nb_recycle_mbufs = j;
Something like:
if (nb_recycle_mbufs == 0) {
for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
if (rxep[i] != NULL)
rte_mempool_put(rxep[i]->pool, rxep[i]);
}
} else
nb_recycle_mbufs = j;
?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Update counters for Tx. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + txq->nb_tx_free = (uint16_t)(txq->nb_tx_free +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +txq-
> > > > > > > > >tx_rs_thresh);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_dd +
> > > > > > > > > > > > +txq-
> > > > > > > > >tx_rs_thresh);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (txq->tx_next_dd >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
> > > > > > > > > > > > + txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq-
> > > >tx_rs_thresh -
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return nb_recycle_mbufs; }
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> > > > > > > > > > > > b4f65b58fa..a9c9eb331c
> > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -3199,6 +3199,30 @@ i40e_txq_info_get(struct
> > > > > > > > > > > > rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > qinfo->conf.offloads = txq->offloads; }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +void
> > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > +uint16_t
> > > > > > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info *recycle_rxq_info) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct i40e_adapter *ad =
> > > > > > > > > > > > + I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data-
> > > > > > > > >dev_private);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[queue_id];
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring = (void *)rxq->sw_ring;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->mp = rxq->mp;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size = rxq->nb_rx_desc;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->receive_tail = &rxq->rx_tail;
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (ad->rx_vec_allowed) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->refill_requirement =
> > > > > > > > > > > > RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->refill_head = &rxq-
> > > >rxrearm_start;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->refill_requirement = rxq-
> > > > > > > > >rx_free_thresh;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + recycle_rxq_info->refill_head = &rxq-
> > > >rx_free_trigger;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86 static inline bool
> > > > > > > > > > > > get_avx_supported(bool request_avx512) @@ -3293,6
> > > > > > > > > > > > +3317,8
> > > > > > @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->rx_pkt_burst = ad-
> > > > > > >rx_use_avx2 ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec_avx2 :
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev-
> > > >recycle_rx_descriptors_refill =
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (ad->rx_use_avx512) { @@ -3311,9
> > > +3337,12
> > > > @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->rx_pkt_burst = ad-
> > > > > > >rx_use_avx2 ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > i40e_recv_pkts_vec_avx2 :
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recv_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev-
> > > >recycle_rx_descriptors_refill =
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > #else /* RTE_ARCH_X86 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev->recycle_rx_descriptors_refill =
> > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Using Vector Scattered Rx
> > > > > > (port %d).", @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > -3481,15 +3510,18 @@ i40e_set_tx_function(struct
> > > > > > > > > > > > rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->tx_pkt_burst = ad-
> > > > > > >tx_use_avx2 ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > i40e_xmit_pkts_vec_avx2 :
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > i40e_xmit_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev->recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse
> > > =
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > #else /* RTE_ARCH_X86 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Using Vector
> > > Tx
> > > > > > (port %d).",
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->data->port_id);
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > i40e_xmit_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev->recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse =
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec; #endif /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > RTE_ARCH_X86
> > > */
> > > > > > > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Simple tx
> > > finally be
> > > > > > used.");
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > i40e_xmit_pkts_simple;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev->recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse =
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->tx_pkt_prepare =
> > > i40e_simple_prep_pkts;
> > > > > > > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h index
> > > > > > > > > > > > a8686224e5..b191f23e1f
> > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ uint32_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_dev_rx_queue_count(void *rx_queue); int
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_dev_rx_descriptor_status(void *rx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t offset); int
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_dev_tx_descriptor_status(void
> > > > > > > > > > > > *tx_queue, uint16_t offset);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +uint16_t i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec(void
> > *tx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info
> > > *recycle_rxq_info);
> > > > > > > > void
> > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec(void
> > > > > > > > > > > > +*rx_queue, uint16_t nb_mbufs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t i40e_recv_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct
> > > > > > > > > > > > rte_mbuf
> > > > > > > > **rx_pkts,
> > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t nb_pkts); uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > --git a/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build
> > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build index
> > > > > > > > > > > > 8e53b87a65..3b1a233c84 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ sources = files(
> > > > > > > > > > > > 'i40e_tm.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > 'i40e_hash.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > 'i40e_vf_representor.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > + 'i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > 'rte_pmd_i40e.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > )
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 145+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 8:16 [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 8:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] net/i40e: remove redundant Dtype initialization Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 8:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] net/i40e: enable direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2022-05-11 22:28 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-04-20 8:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] ethdev: add API for " Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 9:59 ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-29 2:42 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 10:41 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-29 6:28 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-05-10 22:49 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-03 10:19 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-20 10:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-05-02 3:09 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-04-21 14:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-29 6:35 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 8:16 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] net/i40e: add direct rearm mode internal API Feifei Wang
2022-05-11 22:31 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-04-20 8:16 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] examples/l3fwd: enable direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 10:10 ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-21 2:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-04-21 6:40 ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-10 22:01 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-05-11 7:17 ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-11 22:33 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-27 11:28 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-31 17:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-03 10:32 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-06 11:27 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-29 21:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-05-11 23:00 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Konstantin Ananyev
[not found] ` <20220516061012.618787-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>
2022-05-24 1:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-24 12:40 ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-24 20:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-05-28 12:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-01 1:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-03 23:32 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-04 8:07 ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-29 21:58 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-30 15:21 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-01 19:30 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-01 20:28 ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-13 5:55 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: enable direct rearm with separate API Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 8:21 ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-04 8:51 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 10:11 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-24 8:55 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-06 12:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-06 13:26 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-06 14:53 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-06 15:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-07 6:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-07 10:52 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-07 20:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-22 14:43 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-02 14:33 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-24 9:45 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-27 19:31 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-28 2:16 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-28 8:09 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-01 7:34 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] net/i40e: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-02 14:37 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-24 9:50 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-27 19:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-28 2:15 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-07 11:01 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-14 6:07 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-19 16:11 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-23 10:49 ` Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-31 6:13 ` 回复: [PATCH v3 0/3] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2023-02-01 1:10 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-01 2:24 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-22 12:56 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-22 13:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-22 14:04 ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-02 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 8:08 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 8:08 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 8:08 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 8:08 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02 8:08 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-04 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-04 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-04 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-04 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-04 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 7:27 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 7:27 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 14:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-24 3:16 ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 23:33 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-24 3:38 ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 7:27 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 23:43 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-24 6:10 ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-31 17:24 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-31 23:49 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-01 12:22 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-01 14:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-04 6:59 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-04 7:49 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-04 9:24 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-04 10:21 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-05 3:11 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-22 14:58 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-22 15:46 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-22 16:40 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2023-09-23 5:52 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-23 20:40 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-25 3:26 ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 7:27 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 7:27 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 7:33 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 13:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-24 3:11 ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-24 7:36 ` [PATCH v12 " Feifei Wang
2023-08-24 7:36 ` [PATCH v12 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-31 9:16 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-20 13:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-08-24 7:36 ` [PATCH v12 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-24 7:36 ` [PATCH v12 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-24 7:36 ` [PATCH v12 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-09-20 13:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-20 13:12 ` [PATCH v12 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-22 15:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-25 3:19 ` [PATCH v13 " Feifei Wang
2023-09-25 3:19 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-09-25 4:40 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-09-25 3:19 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-09-26 8:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-26 8:56 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-26 13:34 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-25 3:19 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-09-26 13:30 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-25 3:19 ` [PATCH v13 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-09-26 13:30 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-26 16:38 ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-09-27 17:24 ` [PATCH v13 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66d9a4e1cded46f0aa2c1b9f3616667b@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=Yuying.Zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.