From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf report: Implement visual marker for macro fusion in annotate
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 08:42:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66e5087a-fb11-6970-e48c-edec3017f7ea@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497961330-3666-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Hi Arnaldo,
Is this series OK?
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 6/20/2017 8:22 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
> Macro fusion merges two instructions to a single micro-op. Intel
> core platform performs this hardware optimization under limited
> circumstances. For example, CMP + JCC can be "fused" and executed
> /retired together. While with sampling this can result in the
> sample sometimes being on the JCC and sometimes on the CMP.
> So for the fused instruction pair, they could be considered
> together.
>
> On Nehalem, fused instruction pairs:
> cmp/test + jcc.
>
> On other new CPU:
> cmp/test/add/sub/and/inc/dec + jcc.
>
> This patch series marks the case clearly by joining the fused
> instruction pair in the arrow of the jump.
>
> For example:
>
> │ ┌──cmpl $0x0,argp_program_version_hook
> 81.93 │ ├──je 20
> │ │ lock cmpxchg %esi,0x38a9a4(%rip)
> │ │↓ jne 29
> │ │↓ jmp 43
> 11.47 │20:└─→cmpxch %esi,0x38a999(%rip)
>
> Change-log:
> -----------
> v3: 1. Add checking for Nehalem (CMP, TEST). For other newer
> Intel CPUs just check it by default (CMP, TEST, ADD,
> SUB, AND, INC, DEC).
>
> 2. Use Arnaldo's fix to let the display be better
>
> v2: According to Arnaldo's comments, remove the weak function and
> use an arch-specific function instead to check fused instruction
> pair.
>
> v1: Inital post
>
> Jin Yao (2):
> perf util: Check for fused instruction
> perf report: Implement visual marker for macro fusion in annotate
>
> tools/perf/arch/x86/annotate/instructions.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/ui/browser.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/ui/browser.h | 2 ++
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 17 +++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 3 +++
> 6 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 12:22 [PATCH v3 0/2] perf report: Implement visual marker for macro fusion in annotate Jin Yao
2017-06-20 12:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf util: Check for fused instruction Jin Yao
2017-07-06 16:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-07 1:09 ` Jin, Yao
2017-06-20 12:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf report: Implement visual marker for macro fusion in annotate Jin Yao
2017-07-06 0:42 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66e5087a-fb11-6970-e48c-edec3017f7ea@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.