All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:01:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <670f0257.d40a0220.9c8db.5c21@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5a833c4-6346-4ec4-8360-4a818342fb52@paulmck-laptop>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 04:02:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 02:49:06PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:05:02AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > This series contains RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13:
> > > 
> > > 1.	Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function.
> > > 
> > > 2.	Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends.
> > > 
> > > 3.	Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks().
> > > 
> > 
> > Other than small nit in 2/3, 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> Applied, thank you, and I also added the data_race() in 2/3.
> 
> > I was curious if you're seeing perf or other improvements with the
> > finer-grained rnp locking.
> 
> This is about robustness rather that performance, though I suppose you
> could argue that lack of robustness is an extreme form of bad performance.
> Holding the leaf rcu_node locks for too long while dumping stacks can
> result in things like CSD-lock timeouts due to the dumping CPU having
> interrupts disabled for an extended period.
> 
> And earlier commit, 1ecd9d68eb44 ("rcu: Defer printing stall-warning
> backtrace when holding rcu_node lock"), took care of most of the issue
> by deferring the actual output.  But while in the area, it seemed wise
> to avoid up to 64 dumps being generated (but no longer printed) while
> holding a leaf rcu_node lock.
> 
> Hence this commit.

That's smart to do and makes sense, thanks!

 - Joel


> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > thanks,
> > 
> >  - Joel
> > 
> > 
> > > 						Thanx, Paul
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > >  b/include/linux/rcutiny.h |    1 -
> > >  b/include/linux/rcutree.h |    1 -
> > >  b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h |   30 ------------------------------
> > >  kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h   |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-16  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 18:05 [PATCH rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13 Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-09 18:05 ` [PATCH rcu 1/3] rcu: Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-09 18:05 ` [PATCH rcu 2/3] rcu: Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-15 18:48   ` Joel Fernandes
2024-10-09 18:05 ` [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks() Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-15 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13 Joel Fernandes
2024-10-15 23:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16  0:01     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2024-10-16 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 1/3] rcu: Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 2/3] rcu: Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks() Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-29  0:22     ` [PATCH v3 " Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-29  2:20       ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-10-29 16:29         ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-30  3:55           ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-10-30 13:54             ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-30 20:12               ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-30 23:26                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-31  0:21                   ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-31  5:03                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-31 21:27                       ` Doug Anderson
2024-11-01  1:44                         ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-11-01 13:55                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-10-30  8:30                             ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2024-11-01  7:41               ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-11-01 13:59                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-18 21:49   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13 Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=670f0257.d40a0220.9c8db.5c21@mx.google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.