From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:13:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6710300.onecg0m5mP@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0i1iAjpWju6FiCjP3RvspKDRfSwz4=b_3qgGhhfz8sSrw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 8:17:05 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:35 PM Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 2019.11.17 08:13 Doug Smythies wrote:
> > > On 2019.11.16 23:35 Doug Smythies wrote:
> >
> > >> Hi Rafael,
> > >>
> > >> Not sure, but I think it is this one that
> > >> causes complaining when I try to set the
> > >> intel_pstate driver to passive mode.
> > >> I started from active mode, powersave governor,
> > >> no HWP.
> > >>
> > >> Kernel: 5.4-rc7
> > >>
> > >> I did not go back and try previous 5.4 RCs.
> >
> > After looking at the git tags for this patch,
> > I tried kernel 5.4-rc2, which was the closest
> > Kernel I had to before the patch set was added.
> > It worked fine, as expected.
> >
> > >> I did try kernel 5.3-rc8, because I already had
> > >> it installed, and it worked fine.
> > >>
> > >> I use a script (for years), run as sudo:
> > >>
> > >> doug@s15:~/temp$ cat set_cpu_passive
> > >> #! /bin/bash
> > >> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/status
> > >> echo passive > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/status
> > >> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/status
> > >>
> > >> And I get this (very small excerpt):
> > >>
> > >> freq_qos_add_request() called for active request
> > >> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2758 at kernel/power/qos.c:763 freq_qos_add_request+0x4c/0xa0
> > >> CPU: 1 PID: 2758 Comm: set_cpu_passive Not tainted 5.4.0-rc7-stock #727
> > >> Failed to add freq constraint for CPU0 (-22)
> > >>
> > >> freq_qos_add_request() called for active request
> > >> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2758 at kernel/power/qos.c:763 freq_qos_add_request+0x4c/0xa0
> > >> CPU: 1 PID: 2758 Comm: set_cpu_passive Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc7-stock #727
> > >> Failed to add freq constraint for CPU1 (-22)
> >
> > Updated summary of previous emails:
> > This patch or patch set breaks the after boot
> > ability to change CPU frequency scaling drivers.
> >
> > Using a workaround of booting with
> > "intel_pstate=passive" seems to prevent the errors.
> >
> > Changing between the intel_pstate and intel_cpufreq drivers
> > (i.e. between active and passive modes)
> > after boot, either way, causes the errors. i.e.
> >
> > Failed to add freq constraint for CPU7 (-22)
> > (2 per CPU per attempt)
>
> These messages come from acpi_processor_ppc_init() and
> acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(), AFAICS, which are invoked by
> acpi_processor_notifier() and that is invoked by the
> blocking_notifier_call_chain() in cpufreq_online() which tirggers for
> new policies after adding the max freq QoS request to
> policy->constraints.
>
> The requests added by them should be removed by
> acpi_processor_ppc_exit() and acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(),
> respectively, invoked by the blocking_notifier_call_chain() in
> cpufreq_policy_free(), but it looks like that doesn't happen.
>
> However, I now also see that freq_qos_remove_request() doesn't clear
> the qos field in req which is should do, so freq_qos_add_request()
> will complain and fail if the object pointed to by req is passed to it
> again.
>
> I'll send a patch to test for this later today.
>
The patch is appended. Please test it (on top of 5.4-rc8) and report back.
---
kernel/power/qos.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-pm/kernel/power/qos.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -814,6 +814,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(freq_qos_update_reques
*/
int freq_qos_remove_request(struct freq_qos_request *req)
{
+ int ret;
+
if (!req)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -821,7 +823,11 @@ int freq_qos_remove_request(struct freq_
"%s() called for unknown object\n", __func__))
return -EINVAL;
- return freq_qos_apply(req, PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
+ ret = freq_qos_apply(req, PM_QOS_REMOVE_REQ, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
+ req->qos = NULL;
+ req->type = 0;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(freq_qos_remove_request);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 10:37 [RFT][PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS and use it in cpufreq Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 10:41 ` [RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-17 9:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-17 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 5:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-24 19:01 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-10-24 19:34 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-11-17 7:34 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-17 16:13 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-19 14:35 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-19 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-19 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-11-20 6:55 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-20 9:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 10:47 ` [RFT][PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Use per-policy " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 18:01 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-17 21:29 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-18 9:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 15:31 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-16 10:47 ` [RFT][PATCH 3/3] PM: QoS: Drop frequency QoS types from device PM QoS Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16 14:23 ` [RFT][PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS and use it in cpufreq Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 9:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-17 9:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 16:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-17 16:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 5:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 8:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 8:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 9:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-18 9:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-17 17:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6710300.onecg0m5mP@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.