All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+ca440b457d21568f8021@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lizhi.xu@windriver.com,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ocfs2?] possible deadlock in ocfs2_fiemap
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:18:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <671073db.050a0220.d9b66.0177.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017015210.3665821-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in ocfs2_fiemap

         option from the mount to silence this warning.
=======================================================
ocfs2: Mounting device (7,0) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.15/6035 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807a5ee098 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0xaa/0x120 mm/memory.c:6700

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888071633f60 (&oi->ip_alloc_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_fiemap+0x377/0xf80 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:755

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&oi->ip_alloc_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
       ocfs2_page_mkwrite+0x1e9/0xed0 fs/ocfs2/mmap.c:139
       do_page_mkwrite+0x198/0x480 mm/memory.c:3162
       do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:5358 [inline]
       do_fault mm/memory.c:5420 [inline]
       do_pte_missing mm/memory.c:3965 [inline]
       handle_pte_fault+0x11fa/0x6800 mm/memory.c:5751
       __handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:5894 [inline]
       handle_mm_fault+0x1053/0x1ad0 mm/memory.c:6062
       do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1389 [inline]
       handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1481 [inline]
       exc_page_fault+0x2b9/0x8c0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1539
       asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623

-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __might_fault+0xc6/0x120 mm/memory.c:6700
       _inline_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:183 [inline]
       _copy_to_user+0x2a/0xb0 lib/usercopy.c:26
       copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:216 [inline]
       fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x235/0x410 fs/ioctl.c:145
       ocfs2_fiemap+0x9f1/0xf80 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:796
       ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0x1bf8/0x2e40 fs/ioctl.c:841
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:905 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl+0x81/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
                               lock(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
  rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.0.15/6035:
 #0: ffff888071633f60 (&oi->ip_alloc_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_fiemap+0x377/0xf80 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:755

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6035 Comm: syz.0.15 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
 __might_fault+0xc6/0x120 mm/memory.c:6700
 _inline_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:183 [inline]
 _copy_to_user+0x2a/0xb0 lib/usercopy.c:26
 copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:216 [inline]
 fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x235/0x410 fs/ioctl.c:145
 ocfs2_fiemap+0x9f1/0xf80 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:796
 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline]
 do_vfs_ioctl+0x1bf8/0x2e40 fs/ioctl.c:841
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:905 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl+0x81/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f351397dff9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f35147e5038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3513b35f80 RCX: 00007f351397dff9
RDX: 00000000200001c0 RSI: 00000000c020660b RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f35139f0296 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f3513b35f80 R15: 00007ffef5debf08
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         c964ced7 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14483030580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=164d2822debd8b0d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ca440b457d21568f8021
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=12bdf727980000


       reply	other threads:[~2024-10-17  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241017015210.3665821-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
2024-10-17  2:18 ` syzbot [this message]
     [not found] <20241017031934.156050-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
2024-10-17  3:51 ` [syzbot] [ocfs2?] possible deadlock in ocfs2_fiemap syzbot
2024-09-03 20:43 syzbot
2024-09-29  7:52 ` syzbot
2024-10-11 20:59 ` syzbot
2025-10-23  8:33 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=671073db.050a0220.d9b66.0177.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+ca440b457d21568f8021@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.xu@windriver.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.