All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+731b27ee9413ba859499@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in run_unpack_ex
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 23:38:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <672dbfef.050a0220.69327.0000.GAE@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    74741a050b79 Add linux-next specific files for 20241107
git tree:       linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14b4dd87980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d3ef0574c9dc8b00
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=731b27ee9413ba859499
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8993ea1d09da/disk-74741a05.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dab7bc3c6e88/vmlinux-74741a05.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fda543ad532f/bzImage-74741a05.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+731b27ee9413ba859499@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

loop5: detected capacity change from 0 to 4096
ntfs3(loop5): failed to convert "0080" to maccenteuro
ntfs3(loop5): Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc6-next-20241107-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.5.2788/13195 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805e313518 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: run_unpack_ex+0x55e/0x9e0 fs/ntfs3/run.c:1119

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880294f4270 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: run_unpack_ex+0x47a/0x9e0 fs/ntfs3/run.c:1100

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
       down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
       ntfs_look_for_free_space+0x100/0x690 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:362
       attr_allocate_clusters+0x1d6/0x990 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:159
       attr_set_size+0x2053/0x4300 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:574
       ntfs_extend_mft+0x188/0x4b0 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:512
       ntfs_look_free_mft+0x77c/0x10c0 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:709
       ntfs_create_inode+0x581/0x3760 fs/ntfs3/inode.c:1305
       ntfs_create+0x3d/0x50 fs/ntfs3/namei.c:110
       lookup_open fs/namei.c:3649 [inline]
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline]
       path_openat+0x1c03/0x3590 fs/namei.c:3984
       do_filp_open+0x27f/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4014
       do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline]
       __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1495 [inline]
       __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1489 [inline]
       __x64_sys_creat+0x123/0x170 fs/open.c:1489
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
       down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1524
       run_unpack_ex+0x55e/0x9e0 fs/ntfs3/run.c:1119
       ntfs_read_mft fs/ntfs3/inode.c:401 [inline]
       ntfs_iget5+0x1f9a/0x37b0 fs/ntfs3/inode.c:537
       ntfs_dir_emit fs/ntfs3/dir.c:335 [inline]
       ntfs_read_hdr+0x700/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/dir.c:383
       ntfs_readdir+0x91f/0xf00 fs/ntfs3/dir.c:494
       iterate_dir+0x571/0x800 fs/readdir.c:108
       __do_sys_getdents fs/readdir.c:322 [inline]
       __se_sys_getdents+0x1fd/0x4e0 fs/readdir.c:308
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&wnd->rw_lock);
                               lock(&ni->file.run_lock#2);
                               lock(&wnd->rw_lock);
  rlock(&ni->file.run_lock#2);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz.5.2788/13195:
 #0: ffff88802e3249b8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: fdget_pos+0x254/0x320 fs/file.c:1191
 #1: ffff88805e3319a0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x20c/0x800 fs/readdir.c:101
 #2: ffff8880294f4270 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: run_unpack_ex+0x47a/0x9e0 fs/ntfs3/run.c:1100

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 13195 Comm: syz.5.2788 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-next-20241107-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
 down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1524
 run_unpack_ex+0x55e/0x9e0 fs/ntfs3/run.c:1119
 ntfs_read_mft fs/ntfs3/inode.c:401 [inline]
 ntfs_iget5+0x1f9a/0x37b0 fs/ntfs3/inode.c:537
 ntfs_dir_emit fs/ntfs3/dir.c:335 [inline]
 ntfs_read_hdr+0x700/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/dir.c:383
 ntfs_readdir+0x91f/0xf00 fs/ntfs3/dir.c:494
 iterate_dir+0x571/0x800 fs/readdir.c:108
 __do_sys_getdents fs/readdir.c:322 [inline]
 __se_sys_getdents+0x1fd/0x4e0 fs/readdir.c:308
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fc27c77e719
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fc27d5b5038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc27c935f80 RCX: 00007fc27c77e719
RDX: 00000000000000b8 RSI: 0000000020001fc0 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007fc27c7f139e R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fc27c935f80 R15: 00007ffe153b2608
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-08  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08  7:38 syzbot [this message]
2024-12-20  2:51 ` [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in run_unpack_ex syzbot
2024-12-20 22:26 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=672dbfef.050a0220.69327.0000.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+731b27ee9413ba859499@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.