From: Marek Lindner <marek.lindner@mailbox.org>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: maximum observed performance?
Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 18:21:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6738959.vzjCzTo3RI@voltaire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA_JP8XEx6OrY9GV3xLFfyiECZK=cuHSjxWAqFFCVbjQwSdyFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday, 3 May 2026 17:36:29 CEST dan wrote:
> Anyone have any first hand examples or a published doc showing
> multi-gigabit over a layer2 batman-adv? specifically ethernet
> interfaces. The RF layer is separate layer2 bridged and can handle
> iperf of ~2.4Gbps+ (Tachyon and Wave Pro radios).
What is the MTU configuration on the underlying interface? Are your throughput
streams getting fragmented?
You can read more about fragmentation here:
https://www.open-mesh.org/projects/batman-adv/wiki/Fragmentation-technical
Cheers,
Marek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-03 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-03 15:36 maximum observed performance? dan
2026-05-03 16:21 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6738959.vzjCzTo3RI@voltaire \
--to=marek.lindner@mailbox.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.