From: syzbot <syzbot+404b4b745080b6210c6c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 06:39:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67506987.050a0220.17bd51.006f.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1129891.1733321485@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in __submit_bio
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0-rc1-syzkaller-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/75 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888034c41438 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37){++++}-{0:0}, at: __submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8ea35b00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6864 [inline]
ffffffff8ea35b00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x36f0 mm/vmscan.c:7246
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3851 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3865
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4055 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4133 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4282 [inline]
__kmalloc_node_noprof+0xb2/0x4d0 mm/slub.c:4289
__kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650
sbitmap_init_node+0x2d4/0x670 lib/sbitmap.c:132
scsi_realloc_sdev_budget_map+0x2a7/0x460 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:246
scsi_add_lun drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:1106 [inline]
scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x3173/0x4bd0 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:1287
__scsi_add_device+0x228/0x2f0 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:1622
ata_scsi_scan_host+0x236/0x740 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c:4575
async_run_entry_fn+0xa8/0x420 kernel/async.c:129
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa66/0x1840 kernel/workqueue.c:3310
worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3391
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
-> #0 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37){++++}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
bio_queue_enter block/blk.h:75 [inline]
blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1536/0x2390 block/blk-mq.c:3091
__submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629
__submit_bio_noacct_mq block/blk-core.c:710 [inline]
submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x4d3/0xe30 block/blk-core.c:739
swap_writepage_bdev_async mm/page_io.c:451 [inline]
__swap_writepage+0x5fc/0x1400 mm/page_io.c:474
swap_writepage+0x8f4/0x1170 mm/page_io.c:289
pageout mm/vmscan.c:689 [inline]
shrink_folio_list+0x3c0e/0x8cb0 mm/vmscan.c:1367
evict_folios+0x5568/0x7be0 mm/vmscan.c:4593
try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x9a6/0xc70 mm/vmscan.c:4789
shrink_one+0x3b9/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4834
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4897 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4975 [inline]
shrink_node+0x37c5/0x3e50 mm/vmscan.c:5956
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6785 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6977 [inline]
kswapd+0x1ca9/0x36f0 mm/vmscan.c:7246
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37);
lock(fs_reclaim);
rlock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by kswapd0/75:
#0: ffffffff8ea35b00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6864 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8ea35b00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x36f0 mm/vmscan.c:7246
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 75 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-syzkaller-dirty #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
bio_queue_enter block/blk.h:75 [inline]
blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1536/0x2390 block/blk-mq.c:3091
__submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629
__submit_bio_noacct_mq block/blk-core.c:710 [inline]
submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x4d3/0xe30 block/blk-core.c:739
swap_writepage_bdev_async mm/page_io.c:451 [inline]
__swap_writepage+0x5fc/0x1400 mm/page_io.c:474
swap_writepage+0x8f4/0x1170 mm/page_io.c:289
pageout mm/vmscan.c:689 [inline]
shrink_folio_list+0x3c0e/0x8cb0 mm/vmscan.c:1367
evict_folios+0x5568/0x7be0 mm/vmscan.c:4593
try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x9a6/0xc70 mm/vmscan.c:4789
shrink_one+0x3b9/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4834
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4897 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4975 [inline]
shrink_node+0x37c5/0x3e50 mm/vmscan.c:5956
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6785 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6977 [inline]
kswapd+0x1ca9/0x36f0 mm/vmscan.c:7246
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: 40384c84 Linux 6.13-rc1
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git v6.13-rc1
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=101560f8580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=58639d2215ba9a07
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=404b4b745080b6210c6c
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=138c4de8580000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-31 13:07 [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2) syzbot
2024-11-01 14:37 ` [syzbot] " syzbot
2024-11-30 14:44 ` [syzbot] [netfs?] " syzbot
2024-12-02 9:01 ` [syzbot] Re: kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert() syzbot
2024-12-04 13:59 ` [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2) David Howells
2024-12-04 14:20 ` syzbot
2024-12-04 14:11 ` David Howells
2024-12-04 14:39 ` syzbot [this message]
2024-12-04 14:43 ` David Howells
2024-12-05 9:38 ` David Howells
2024-12-05 9:59 ` syzbot
[not found] <20241101143702.uKzjo%dmantipov@yandex.ru>
2024-11-01 14:57 ` syzbot
[not found] <20241202090100.qZXuh%dmantipov@yandex.ru>
2024-12-02 9:21 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67506987.050a0220.17bd51.006f.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+404b4b745080b6210c6c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.