All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, upstream@airoha.com,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 CPUFreq SMCCC driver
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 16:13:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <675071ab.7b0a0220.183cea.8610@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202412041929.8aCqrGnO-lkp@intel.com>

On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 07:22:41PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
> [also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge robh/for-next linus/master v6.13-rc1 next-20241203]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Marangi/cpufreq-airoha-Add-EN7581-CPUFreq-SMCCC-driver/20241204-113105
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203163158.580-2-ansuelsmth%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 CPUFreq SMCCC driver
> config: arm-randconfig-003 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041929.8aCqrGnO-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 592c0fe55f6d9a811028b5f3507be91458ab2713)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041929.8aCqrGnO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041929.8aCqrGnO-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:41:34: error: variable has incomplete type 'const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       41 |         const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>          |                                         ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:41:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       41 |         const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>          |                      ^
> >> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:45:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       45 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
>          |                                   ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:41:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       41 |         const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>          |                      ^
> >> drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:47:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_smc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>       47 |         arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
>          |         ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:81:34: error: variable has incomplete type 'const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       81 |         const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>          |                                         ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:81:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       81 |         const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>          |                      ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:86:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       86 |         struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
>          |                                   ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:81:15: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs'
>       81 |         const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>          |                      ^
>    drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c:88:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_smc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>       88 |         arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
>          |         ^
>    6 errors generated.
> 
> 
> vim +41 drivers/cpufreq/airoha-cpufreq.c
> 
>     37	
>     38	static unsigned long airoha_cpufreq_clk_get(struct clk_hw *hw,
>     39						    unsigned long parent_rate)
>     40	{
>   > 41		const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args = {
>     42			.a0 = AIROHA_SIP_AVS_HANDLE,
>     43			.a1 = AIROHA_AVS_OP_GET_FREQ,
>     44		};
>   > 45		struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
>     46	
>   > 47		arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&args, &res);
>     48	
>     49		/* SMCCC returns freq in MHz */
>     50		return (int)(res.a0 * 1000 * 1000);
>     51	}
>     52	
> 
> -- 
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

False positive or better say my error in the kconfig depends logic

This driver REQUIRE ARM64 bit for smccc and the target SoC is 64bit
only. The randconfig catch a situation with ARCH_AIROHA and 32bit.

-- 
	Ansuel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-04 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-03 16:31 [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Document support for Airoha EN7581 CPUFreq Christian Marangi
2024-12-03 16:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 CPUFreq SMCCC driver Christian Marangi
2024-12-04  5:32   ` Viresh Kumar
2024-12-04  7:04     ` Christian Marangi
2024-12-04  7:06       ` Viresh Kumar
2024-12-04 11:22   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-04 15:13     ` Christian Marangi [this message]
2024-12-04 14:48   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-04 18:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Document support for Airoha EN7581 CPUFreq Rob Herring
2024-12-04 18:51   ` Christian Marangi
2024-12-04 20:30     ` Rob Herring
2024-12-05  9:01       ` Christian Marangi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=675071ab.7b0a0220.183cea.8610@mx.google.com \
    --to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=upstream@airoha.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.