All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Fedorishenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ip_conntrack problem / perfomance
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:47:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6788034296.20021004104703@nuclearcat.com> (raw)

Dear Mr. linux-net@vger.kernel.org !

I got some problem with conntrack. Very strange problems...

1st - i compile it as module on RedHat kernel 2.4.18-3custom.
I have NAT on this machine, and have users who work on it.
When i start benchmark (polygraph + proxy server) on same host -
perfomance is ~800 req/s.

2nd - i have another, same configuration PC, and have compiled in (not
as module) 2.4.18-10custom and 2.4.20-pre8-ac3 kernel. When it
compiled in - i have at starts ~800 req/s and after 10-20 seconds it
decrease to ~200req/s. If i compile ip_conntrack as module, and not use
ip_conntrack - 1000 req/s. If use as module - decrease to 200 req/s.

I have questions:

1)Is a possible to use any alternative hash for ip_conntrack or like
this?
2)Why conntrack track all requests (for example local) and what way to
drop this tracks, but i still need ip_conntrack to NAT?
3)Any other suggestions?

About hardware:
2xPIII|1.3Ghz / ServerWorks / 2xEtherExpress/100 /1GB RAM

Also in logs, not always, but i see messages like "ip_conntrack: table
full, dropping packet.", but on 2.4.18-custom3 i see this messages
too... but it works 800 req/s :)

Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fedorishenko Denis Olegovich
nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com * Tel: +380 679322793
www.nuclearcat.com * www.planetsky.org * www.itelsat.org


                 reply	other threads:[~2002-10-04  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6788034296.20021004104703@nuclearcat.com \
    --to=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.