All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+93ea1efef88821c553ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: amir73il@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in ovl_create_object
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 08:12:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <679e47e7.050a0220.d7c5a.005f.GAE@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    805ba04cb7cc Merge tag 'mips_6.14' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=157e6364580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2ae8afe424ee551e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=93ea1efef88821c553ad
compiler:       gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-805ba04c.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f9b9a1354470/vmlinux-805ba04c.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6c77f51f864a/bzImage-805ba04c.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+93ea1efef88821c553ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0-syzkaller-08291-g805ba04cb7cc #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.4.1894/11640 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805ad04420 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ovl_create_object+0x12e/0x300 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:656

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880362ed258 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:865 [inline]
ffff8880362ed258 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3745 [inline]
ffff8880362ed258 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x15a4/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3984

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}:
       down_read+0x9a/0x330 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1524
       inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:875 [inline]
       lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1807 [inline]
       walk_component+0x342/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:2112
       lookup_last fs/namei.c:2610 [inline]
       path_lookupat+0x17f/0x770 fs/namei.c:2634
       filename_lookup+0x221/0x5f0 fs/namei.c:2663
       kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2771
       lookup_bdev+0xd9/0x280 block/bdev.c:1163
       resume_store+0x1d8/0x460 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1242
       kobj_attr_store+0x55/0x80 lib/kobject.c:840
       sysfs_kf_write+0x117/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:139
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x33d/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
       new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
       vfs_write+0x5ae/0x1150 fs/read_write.c:679
       ksys_write+0x12b/0x250 fs/read_write.c:731
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x27b/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:325
       iter_file_splice_write+0x90f/0x10b0 fs/splice.c:743
       do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline]
       do_splice+0x146a/0x1f70 fs/splice.c:1354
       __do_splice+0x327/0x360 fs/splice.c:1436
       __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1639 [inline]
       __se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1621 [inline]
       __x64_sys_splice+0x187/0x250 fs/splice.c:1621
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&pipe->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730
       pipe_lock fs/pipe.c:92 [inline]
       pipe_lock+0x64/0x80 fs/pipe.c:89
       iter_file_splice_write+0x1eb/0x10b0 fs/splice.c:687
       do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline]
       do_splice+0x146a/0x1f70 fs/splice.c:1354
       __do_splice+0x327/0x360 fs/splice.c:1436
       __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1639 [inline]
       __se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1621 [inline]
       __x64_sys_splice+0x187/0x250 fs/splice.c:1621
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228
       lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1773 [inline]
       sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1909 [inline]
       mnt_want_write+0x6f/0x450 fs/namespace.c:547
       ovl_create_object+0x12e/0x300 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:656
       lookup_open.isra.0+0x11c8/0x1580 fs/namei.c:3649
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline]
       path_openat+0x904/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3984
       do_filp_open+0x20c/0x470 fs/namei.c:4014
       do_sys_openat2+0x17a/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1427
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
       __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1450 [inline]
       __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1446 [inline]
       __x64_sys_open+0x154/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1446
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  sb_writers#6 --> &of->mutex --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2);
                               lock(&of->mutex);
                               lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2);
  rlock(sb_writers#6);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz.4.1894/11640:
 #0: ffff88805690c420 (sb_writers#20){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3737 [inline]
 #0: ffff88805690c420 (sb_writers#20){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x1fab/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3984
 #1: ffff8880362ed258 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:865 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880362ed258 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3745 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880362ed258 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x15a4/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3984

stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 11640 Comm: syz.4.1894 Not tainted 6.13.0-syzkaller-08291-g805ba04cb7cc #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x490/0x760 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2076
 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2208
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228
 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851
 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
 __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1773 [inline]
 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1909 [inline]
 mnt_want_write+0x6f/0x450 fs/namespace.c:547
 ovl_create_object+0x12e/0x300 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:656
 lookup_open.isra.0+0x11c8/0x1580 fs/namei.c:3649
 open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline]
 path_openat+0x904/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3984
 do_filp_open+0x20c/0x470 fs/namei.c:4014
 do_sys_openat2+0x17a/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1427
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1450 [inline]
 __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1446 [inline]
 __x64_sys_open+0x154/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1446
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fb22938cda9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fb22a1f9038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fb2295a5fa0 RCX: 00007fb22938cda9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000060142 RDI: 0000000020000000
RBP: 00007fb22940e2a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fb2295a5fa0 R15: 00007ffe95a187a8
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

                 reply	other threads:[~2025-02-01 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=679e47e7.050a0220.d7c5a.005f.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+93ea1efef88821c553ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.