From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E112B35958; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 06:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762928047; cv=none; b=J+F09p3kO5s53sNO82CAFXzRqoATppIRecJ62G13myzj5wPgYIoCCD5yBV22yQG13uTSqhK8XzUEHLRV4UqSP6zeLAIhn4KGyKpVIKmc0T0vS3uWbML3Jcf9FggusMPNyb7zxQhLKxNgzqpXig7P4Hhsm2w/8INDvo1o71Y1AM0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762928047; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G5iECnerdsVT4LC6jCWPFJW8NjU+pWzUl9LUg8UPdS0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=CrohlA2BNAIKPHnsvxeOT1NVVxOmFrVSOMcqicTPCwVclBx+ue1XHOipz2KQ+DB8+xMPeCPkGKiQe7gj/Cy7o4U90Rl0RisXo9Glz4+Jzyz2DJgUd55NhUg6Tk1s7vj13V3oNvt+E7i96beXjNDRHUDPTGII5RMX7zbEe0NPqgY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VTB+v3NM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VTB+v3NM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1762928045; x=1794464045; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G5iECnerdsVT4LC6jCWPFJW8NjU+pWzUl9LUg8UPdS0=; b=VTB+v3NMuSB+9B4sXPk+1XcquxedfQit3ZXhrxUg1LOUbE0ZBeregZIR 2hvIes5bpidoi65KW1EVjGpauCn4z6MxoVB4UfFHsA/kQJPIpRTt7yLFn jnbxQUbaTTwudVcfu+Uu9EpwPtIDAVKZXFbpp1x4wMDp+aDDrWI3eZHQS yGZERiOMOhotcWCWmr0BHu4Cy8PKInGGVP/smLluMR3TOwiK/z9jtx9E1 kjCyPSsAfOrUZQhkWnijiXuxj331hYK92kJ9TiIluMlf0EbUnHslmFnx+ 8A55XV3+K3UOxJBORojqz4wns7y8h2uLrAKLV+scGIOAYIy2g85q0PUgL w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pjYLlPz8Sse/F4vvq7ly9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1yWYr1moQ2Swan4XGu1rKQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11610"; a="68847726" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,298,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="68847726" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2025 22:14:04 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IgPIk0HvSlWi8rgYEjGXFA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: d+pvoL3VSaihQb/3BgbAkg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,298,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="212528421" Received: from yungchua-mobl2.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.246.105.97]) ([10.246.105.97]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2025 22:14:03 -0800 Message-ID: <679f8b6d-727e-44b2-abd8-714dffc35228@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:13:53 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soundwire: send multi sections in one BPT stream To: Vinod Koul Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev, bard.liao@intel.com References: <20251021094355.132943-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: "Liao, Bard" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/12/2025 1:12 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 21-10-25, 17:43, Bard Liao wrote: >> Currently we send a BRA message with a start address with continuous >> registers in a BPT stream. However, a codec may need to write different >> register sections shortly. It makes more sense to send different >> register sections in a BPT stream and no need to close/open the BPT >> stream repeatedly. >> >> This series depends on the "ASoC/soundwire: add fake BPT frame to align >> Intel DMA buffer size" series. Sending it now to get more review time. > > I have applied it on top of above series, pls check why it is not > applying in : > error: patch failed: drivers/soundwire/intel_ace2x.c:156 > error: drivers/soundwire/intel_ace2x.c: patch does not apply > Hi Vinod, I just tried "git am" this series again and it can apply on top of 04878e873d94 ("ASoC/soundwire: add fake BPT frame to align Intel DMA buffer size"). Also, I checked drivers/soundwire/intel_ace2x.c line 156 and it has the same content as the "soundwire: introduce BPT section" patch. Sorry, I have no idea why it didn't apply. Could you please try again?