All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, john lists <john4lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Need urgent help in fixing raid5 array
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:56:31 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <680071.18057.qm@web30803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: alpine.DEB.1.10.0901021355370.3485@p34.internal.lan

BTW, several of the disks that md didn't want to assemble have perfectly valid uuid info on them.  if I try and manually specify the devices in the --assemble line, and add the ones that are missing (but have a valid uuid for the array), even with the force option, md refuses to assemble them.  The disks can't be all bad can they?  That's 4 drives out of 14 that would have all had to go bad at once. 

thx
Mike




----- Original Message ----
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; john lists <john4lists@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 10:57:13 AM
Subject: Re: Need urgent help in fixing raid5 array



On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Mike Myers wrote:

> Well, I can read from sdg1 just fine.  It seems to work ok, at least for a few GB of data.   I'll try this on some of the other disks, but it is possible for to pull the disks out of the backplane and run the SFF-8087 fanout cables direct to each drive and bypass the backplane completely.  It certainly would be easy to do this for the at least the sdo1 drive and see if I can get better results going direct to the disk.  I have moved the disks around the backplane a bit to deal with the issues of the controller failure, so I am pretty sure it's not just one bad slot or the like.
> 
> So you've seen a backplane fail in away that the disks come up fine at boot but have corrupted data transfers across them?  I wonder about the sata cables in that case as well.  I could hook up a pair of PMP's to my SI3132's and bypass the 8077 cables as well.

1. Try by-passing the backplane.
2. Bad cables will usually cause smart identifier UDMA_CRC_Error_Count to
   increase quite high, if it is 0 or close to it, the cable is unlikely the
   issue.
3. I have seem all kinds of weirdness with bad backplanes, drives dropping out
   of the array, drives producing I/O errors, etc.

Justin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



      

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-02 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <451872.61166.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
2009-01-01 15:40 ` Need urgent help in fixing raid5 array Justin Piszcz
2009-01-01 17:51   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-01 18:29     ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-01 18:40       ` Jon Nelson
2009-01-01 20:38         ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02  6:19       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 12:10         ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 18:12           ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 18:22             ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 18:46               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 18:57                 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 20:46                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 20:56                   ` Mike Myers [this message]
2009-01-02 21:37                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03  4:19                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03  4:43                     ` Guy Watkins
2009-01-03  5:02                       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03 12:46                         ` John Robinson
2009-01-03 15:49                           ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03 16:14                             ` John Robinson
2009-01-03 16:47                               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03 19:03                               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-05 22:11         ` Neil Brown
2009-01-05 22:22           ` Mike Myers
2009-01-05 22:53             ` NeilBrown
2009-01-06  2:46               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-06  4:00                 ` NeilBrown
2009-01-06  5:55                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-06 23:23                     ` Neil Brown
2009-01-06  6:24                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-06 23:31                     ` Neil Brown
2009-01-06 23:54                       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-07  0:19                         ` NeilBrown
2009-01-13  5:38                       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-13  5:57                         ` Mike Myers
2009-01-01 15:31 Mike Myers
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-05 17:03 Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:18 ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:24   ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-06  0:47     ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:51       ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-06  0:58         ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06 19:02         ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06 19:30           ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06 20:14             ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:52     ` David Lethe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=680071.18057.qm@web30803.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=mikesm559@yahoo.com \
    --cc=john4lists@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.