All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schinzel <schinzel@ip-projects.de>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.paumonne@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 09:07:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <686bc4d118c3496e83f3c19c64ee53ef@ip-projects.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483115698.32021.102.camel@citrix.com>

Ok, it seems there is no way to Upgrade the Intel ME Version. In the lates BIOS Version of Supermicro it is 

-------[ ME Analyzer v1.7.0_35 RC ]-------
            Database r75_3

File:     X9DRi5.709

Firmware: Intel SPS
Version:  02.01.07.231.1
Release:  Production
Type:     Region
Mode:     Dual OPR
Date:     10/05/2013
Size:     0x2F0000

Also i dont know, if this is realy the issue. Because with a non Hypervisor Kernel it work all fine. 


Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Michael Schinzel
- Geschäftsführer -


IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG
Am Vogelherd 14
D - 97295 Waldbrunn 
Telefon: 09306 - 76499-0
FAX: 09306 - 76499-15
E-Mail: info@ip-projects.de
Geschäftsführer: Michael Schinzel
Registergericht Würzburg: HRA 6798
Komplementär: IP-Projects Verwaltungs GmbH



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Dezember 2016 17:35
An: Michael Schinzel <schinzel@ip-projects.de>; Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.paumonne@citrix.com>; Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Betreff: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated

[Cc-ing someone which have done disk benchmark in somewhat recent time]

On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 14:26 +0000, Michael Schinzel wrote:
> We have searched in the last days more and more for the cause of this 
> performance issue.
>  
> In cooperation with the datacenter, we change some hardware to check, 
> if the problem already proceeds. We put the RAID Controller included 
> all RAID Arrays to another Supermicro Mainboard: X10SLM-F with only 
> one CPU. The result was, we got 400 MB/s read Speed. So it seems there 
> is an issue with the Servers Mainboard / CPU and the Xen Hypervisor 
> but, we also change the Mainboard to an Supermicro X9DR3-F with the 
> actual BIOS Version 3.2a – these also do not solved the problem with 
> the performance.
>  
> What we also have done:
> -          Upgraded Hypervisor from default Debian 8 – 4.4.1 to 4.8.
> -          Tested some kernel boot configurations\
>
I think it would be useful to know more about your configuration, e.g., are these tests being done in Dom0? How many vCPUs and memory does Dom0 have?

> With an non hypervisor Kernel, the system also uses the read Cache of 
> the controller and after some read operations at the same file, it 
> gets 1.2 G/s back from the Cache. At Xen Hypervisor Kernel, it seems 
> the system do not use any caching operations. I also tested a bit with 
> hdparm:
>  
> root@v7:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/sdb
>  
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing cached reads:   14060 MB in  1.99 seconds = 7076.16 MB/sec 
> Timing buffered disk reads: 304 MB in  3.01 seconds = 100.85 MB/sec
>  
> This Performance is horrable. It is a RAID 10 with read/write cache 
> and SSD Caching functions.
>  
> Does somebody know how Xen proceeds with such Caching Systems?
>  
>  
> Yours sincerely
>  
> Michael Schinzel
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-31  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-27 14:26 Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated Michael Schinzel
2016-12-30 16:34 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-30 16:53   ` Michael Schinzel
2016-12-31  9:07   ` Michael Schinzel [this message]
2017-01-02  7:15   ` Michael Schinzel
2017-01-12 17:03     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-13 13:32       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-26 11:48 Michael Schinzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=686bc4d118c3496e83f3c19c64ee53ef@ip-projects.de \
    --to=schinzel@ip-projects.de \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.paumonne@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.