From: syzbot <syzbot+2e9e529ac0b319316453@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
ujwal.kundur@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [block?] possible deadlock in __del_gendisk
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 08:45:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <688e327f.a70a0220.249f57.0003.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALkFLL+Lcs=wiD11AxJGt9zQ0k3Lo23ppJ2yRbW3qLV7ZOi7+A@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in del_gendisk
wlan1: Created IBSS using preconfigured BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50
wlan1: Creating new IBSS network, BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.16.0-syzkaller-ga6923c06a3b2-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:2/36 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888025106188 (&set->update_nr_hwq_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xf0/0x180 block/genhd.c:823
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880251060d8 (&set->tag_list_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xe8/0x180 block/genhd.c:822
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&set->tag_list_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760
blk_mq_sysfs_register+0x196/0x530 block/blk-mq-sysfs.c:232
blk_register_queue+0xf2/0x400 block/blk-sysfs.c:884
__add_disk+0x677/0xd50 block/genhd.c:528
add_disk_fwnode+0xfc/0x480 block/genhd.c:597
<kernel::block::mq::gen_disk::GenDiskBuilder>::build::<rnull::NullBlkDevice> rust/kernel/block/mq/gen_disk.rs:160 [inline]
<rnull::NullBlkModule as kernel::InPlaceModule>::init::{closure#0} drivers/block/rnull.rs:49 [inline]
<rnull::NullBlkModule as kernel::InPlaceModule>::init+0x8ee/0xc00 drivers/block/rnull.rs:46
rnull::__module_init::__module_init::__init drivers/block/rnull.rs:27 [inline]
__rnull_mod_init+0x1a/0x70 drivers/block/rnull.rs:27
do_one_initcall+0x233/0x820 init/main.c:1269
do_initcall_level+0x104/0x190 init/main.c:1331
do_initcalls+0x59/0xa0 init/main.c:1347
kernel_init_freeable+0x334/0x4a0 init/main.c:1579
kernel_init+0x1d/0x1d0 init/main.c:1469
ret_from_fork+0x3f9/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #0 (&set->update_nr_hwq_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1522
del_gendisk+0xf0/0x180 block/genhd.c:823
nbd_dev_remove drivers/block/nbd.c:268 [inline]
nbd_dev_remove_work+0x47/0xe0 drivers/block/nbd.c:284
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3400
kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:464
ret_from_fork+0x3f9/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
lock(&set->update_nr_hwq_lock);
lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
rlock(&set->update_nr_hwq_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kworker/u8:2/36:
#0: ffff888025c60148 ((wq_completion)nbd-del){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3211 [inline]
#0: ffff888025c60148 ((wq_completion)nbd-del){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x9b4/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
#1: ffffc90000ac7bc0 ((work_completion)(&nbd->remove_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3212 [inline]
#1: ffffc90000ac7bc0 ((work_completion)(&nbd->remove_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x9ef/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
#2: ffff8880251060d8 (&set->tag_list_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xe8/0x180 block/genhd.c:822
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 36 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 6.16.0-syzkaller-ga6923c06a3b2-dirty #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
Workqueue: nbd-del nbd_dev_remove_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1522
del_gendisk+0xf0/0x180 block/genhd.c:823
nbd_dev_remove drivers/block/nbd.c:268 [inline]
nbd_dev_remove_work+0x47/0xe0 drivers/block/nbd.c:284
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3400
kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:464
ret_from_fork+0x3f9/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: a6923c06 Merge tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1346dcf0580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=18eb6d916c138763
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2e9e529ac0b319316453
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.7 (++20250616065708+6146a88f6049-1~exp1~20250616065826.132), Debian LLD 20.1.7
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=11010aa2580000
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-02 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CALkFLL+Lcs=wiD11AxJGt9zQ0k3Lo23ppJ2yRbW3qLV7ZOi7+A@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 15:45 ` syzbot [this message]
[not found] <CALkFLL+Rdkg+-WA+Jb10QfnPoiYpVqHRi+NUvNiAw=XLe6kuhg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 23:17 ` [syzbot] [block?] possible deadlock in __del_gendisk syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLL+WiKWCw1zOPhBJZ=wLQjZPYvhUhEoxDOmeO8F_w7Vmng@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 22:44 ` syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLLLFkpaTLff6E4wUA-fYBZM69u0azLF+frYZrf9eSuRzJQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 22:33 ` syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLLJjzTD3HpPLnaKwVKn-47rJQBghaSrpZCT8Nrbf3CiH9g@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 13:09 ` syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLLKa454W2SGq3aGY+WxOHkx7bAkVAZO7vpXU0v7h6dQtOg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 12:45 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250529102503.2425-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-05-29 10:41 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250528105149.2400-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-05-28 11:07 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250527112459.2370-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-05-27 11:42 ` syzbot
2025-05-26 13:05 syzbot
2025-05-27 3:12 ` syzbot
2025-06-23 4:43 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-23 4:00 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=688e327f.a70a0220.249f57.0003.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+2e9e529ac0b319316453@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ujwal.kundur@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.