Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] Fix missing fops.owner in Rust DRM/misc abstractions

[Alvin Sun <alvin.sun@linux.dev>]

Hi Miguel,

Thanks for taking a look!

On 7/31/26 14:46, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 4:11 AM Alvin Sun <alvin.sun@linux.dev> wrote:
>> base-commit: b7e5ac83cb16f7ffd11dc23736f84276602100ed
> Was this old tag used for some reason?

That was an oversight on my part - I forgot to rebase onto the latest
tag before sending v9. The series is now based on v7.2-rc4.

>
>> prerequisite-change-id: 20260519-miscdev-use-format-9ab7e83b1c11:v3
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 405b334ff0d48ad350014f05a2321bdbaa025400
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 604b631c81d5423f4ebb2e12ba2d22e9ce371bfc
>> prerequisite-patch-id: cb550d94cefe01920e0d3ced2b2bcbecd76f3907
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3bc830839742591460cb86d9472c04f4686dc600
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 571058244bc8c7088638d2e3225713011246c7e9
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 347c5a3c6dbef9832bfce8419fc23e6e08ba477f
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3e202d988b56b88446f7535e90d3f00cf5f15701
> Are all these actually needed? Some seem unrelated (some were already
> applied too).

The prerequisites were just some import formatting changes that the
series depended on at the time. After rebasing onto v7.2-rc4, I was
able to drop all of them - the rebase was clean with no conflicts.

I'll send v10 shortly.

Best regards,
Alvin

> The only one that seems needed has Andreas' Acked-by, so
> I guess it is fine.
>
> (By the way, I will use this second message to take this chance to
> move the modules maintainers in the To: in case it helps, since I
> didn't do it in my previous message)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel