From: syzbot <syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Forwarded: [PATCH v5] hugetlbfs: move lock assertions after early returns in huge_pmd_unshare()
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:40:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68ed9bee.050a0220.91a22.01f4.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68d26261.a70a0220.4f78.0003.GAE@google.com>
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.
***
Subject: [PATCH v5] hugetlbfs: move lock assertions after early returns in huge_pmd_unshare()
Author: kartikey406@gmail.com
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
When hugetlb_vmdelete_list() processes VMAs during truncate operations,
it may encounter VMAs where huge_pmd_unshare() is called without the
required shareable lock. This triggers an assertion failure in
hugetlb_vma_assert_locked().
The previous fix in commit dd83609b8898 ("hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without
shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list") skipped entire VMAs without
shareable locks to avoid the assertion. However, this prevented pages
from being unmapped and freed, causing a regression in fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE)
operations where pages were not freed immediately, as reported by Mark Brown.
Instead of checking locks in the caller or skipping VMAs, move the lock
assertions in huge_pmd_unshare() to after the early return checks. The
assertions are only needed when actual PMD unsharing work will be performed.
If the function returns early because sz != PMD_SIZE or the PMD is not
shared, no locks are required and assertions should not fire.
This is cleaner than previous approaches because it keeps all the logic
within huge_pmd_unshare() itself, while still allowing page unmapping and
freeing to proceed for all VMAs.
Reported-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
Fixes: dd83609b8898 ("hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20250925203504.7BE02C4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org/ [v1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20250928185232.BEDB6C4CEF0@smtp.kernel.org/ [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251003174553.3078839-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v3]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251008052759.469714-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/ [v4]
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v5:
- Move lock assertions after early return checks in huge_pmd_unshare()
per David's suggestion - cleaner approach that keeps logic within the
function itself
- Revert all previous approaches (VMA skipping, flag additions, caller checks)
Changes in v4:
- Check __vma_shareable_lock() in __unmap_hugepage_range() before calling
huge_pmd_unshare() per Oscar's suggestion
- Remove ZAP_FLAG_NO_UNSHARE flag per David's feedback
Changes in v3:
- Add ZAP_FLAG_NO_UNSHARE to skip only PMD unsharing, not entire VMA
Changes in v2:
- Skip entire VMAs without shareable locks (caused PUNCH_HOLE regression)
Changes in v1:
- Initial fix attempt
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 795ee393eac0..0455119716ec 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -7614,13 +7614,12 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
p4d_t *p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
pud_t *pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
- i_mmap_assert_write_locked(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
- hugetlb_vma_assert_locked(vma);
if (sz != PMD_SIZE)
return 0;
if (!ptdesc_pmd_is_shared(virt_to_ptdesc(ptep)))
return 0;
-
+ i_mmap_assert_write_locked(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
+ hugetlb_vma_assert_locked(vma);
pud_clear(pud);
/*
* Once our caller drops the rmap lock, some other process might be
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 9:03 [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in hugetlb_vma_assert_locked syzbot
2025-09-25 10:40 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list syzbot
2025-09-25 13:43 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: skip non-shareable VMAs " syzbot
2025-09-25 23:19 ` Forwarded: [PATCH v2] hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks " syzbot
2025-09-25 23:19 ` syzbot
2025-09-26 0:32 ` syzbot
2025-10-03 16:11 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: skip PMD unsharing when shareable lock unavailable syzbot
2025-10-07 6:01 ` Forwarded: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: check for shareable lock before calling huge_pmd_unshare() syzbot
2025-10-14 0:40 ` syzbot [this message]
2025-10-14 3:35 ` Forwarded: [PATCH v5] hugetlbfs: move lock assertions after early returns in huge_pmd_unshare() syzbot
2025-10-14 4:14 ` Forwarded: [PATCH v6] " syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68ed9bee.050a0220.91a22.01f4.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.