From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LYpOS-00065P-42
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:23:20 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LYpOQ-000657-M0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:23:19 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36915 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYpOQ-000654-Jf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:23:18 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:44872)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <herbszt@gmx.de>) id 1LYpOP-0006ot-NP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:23:18 -0500
Message-ID: <690772E95408420E816D0FC781CFDF83@FSCPC>
From: "Sebastian Herbszt" <herbszt@gmx.de>
References: <20090209143017.GG28969@redhat.com>
	<336692845B5F4E10A22861C218D4EEBF@FSCPC>
	<20090209210027.GA13234@redhat.com>
	<4990A014.1040202@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090210072006.GB13234@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090210072006.GB13234@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bochs-developers] [PATCH] Read additionalACPI
	tables from a VM
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:22:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: bochs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net

Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:28:52PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>  And unpatched bochs bios does not
>>> boot linux with qemu. IRQ routing problem or something.
>>>   
>>
>> Unless upstream Bochs has regressed.  Did you apply the other patches in  
>> the QEMU series?  Some are no longer needed I think.
>>
> With all qemu patches IRQ problem goes away. (One qemu patch conflicts with
> the last bochs commit so I reverted it before applying qemu series).

Can you please try upstream bochs with only 0010_bios-mark-the-acpi-sci-interrupt-as-connected-to-irq-9.patch
applied from the qemu bios patch queue?

- Sebastian