From: syzbot <syzbot+0b2e79f91ff6579bfa5b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Forwarded: [PATCH] nsfs: skip active reference management on initial namespaces
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 03:43:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <690ddb6f.a70a0220.22f260.0045.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <690bfb9e.050a0220.2e3c35.0013.GAE@google.com>
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com.
***
Subject: [PATCH] nsfs: skip active reference management on initial namespaces
Author: kartikey406@gmail.com
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
Initial namespaces (init_net, init_uts_ns, init_pid_ns, etc.) are
statically allocated and exist for the entire lifetime of the system.
They should not participate in active reference counting.
When operations involve initial namespaces, both ns_ref_active_get()
and ns_ref_active_put() were managing active references on them.
This caused the active reference count to become imbalanced, leading
to warnings in __ns_ref_active_get() and __ns_ref_active_put().
Fix by adding is_initial_namespace() checks in both the
ns_ref_active_get and ns_ref_active_put macros. Initial namespaces
are now completely excluded from active reference management,
treating them as permanent kernel resources.
Reported-by: syzbot+0b2e79f91ff6579bfa5b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/ns_common.h | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ns_common.h b/include/linux/ns_common.h
index bd4492ef6ffc..b22c692b5f38 100644
--- a/include/linux/ns_common.h
+++ b/include/linux/ns_common.h
@@ -289,7 +289,10 @@ static __always_inline void __ns_ref_active_get(struct ns_common *ns)
VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE(is_initial_namespace(ns) && __ns_ref_active_read(ns) <= 0);
}
#define ns_ref_active_get(__ns) \
- do { if (__ns) __ns_ref_active_get(to_ns_common(__ns)); } while (0)
+ do { \
+ if ((__ns) && !is_initial_namespace(&(__ns)->ns)) \
+ __ns_ref_active_get(to_ns_common(__ns)); \
+ } while (0)
static __always_inline bool __ns_ref_active_get_not_zero(struct ns_common *ns)
{
@@ -314,7 +317,10 @@ static __always_inline void __ns_ref_active_put(struct ns_common *ns)
}
}
#define ns_ref_active_put(__ns) \
- do { if (__ns) __ns_ref_active_put(to_ns_common(__ns)); } while (0)
+ do { \
+ if ((__ns) && !is_initial_namespace(&(__ns)->ns)) \
+ __ns_ref_active_put(to_ns_common(__ns)); \
+ } while (0)
static __always_inline struct ns_common *__must_check ns_get_unless_inactive(struct ns_common *ns)
{
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 1:36 [syzbot] [fs?] WARNING in nsproxy_ns_active_put syzbot
2025-11-07 10:14 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] fs/nsfs: skip dropping active refs on initial namespaces syzbot
2025-11-07 11:16 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] ns: skip active reference management " syzbot
2025-11-07 11:41 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] nsfs: " syzbot
2025-11-07 11:43 ` syzbot
2025-11-07 11:43 ` syzbot [this message]
2025-11-09 8:24 ` [syzbot] [fs?] WARNING in nsproxy_ns_active_put syzbot
2025-11-11 9:24 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 9:46 ` syzbot
2025-11-11 10:26 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 11:02 ` syzbot
2025-11-11 11:23 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 11:38 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 13:03 ` syzbot
2025-11-11 15:07 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 16:14 ` syzbot
2025-11-11 21:29 ` [PATCH] nsproxy: fix free_nsproxy() and simplify create_new_namespaces() Christian Brauner
2025-11-13 11:19 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-13 13:05 ` Christian Brauner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-06 1:35 [syzbot] [fs?] WARNING in nsproxy_ns_active_get syzbot
2025-11-07 11:44 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] nsfs: skip active reference management on initial namespaces syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=690ddb6f.a70a0220.22f260.0045.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+0b2e79f91ff6579bfa5b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.