From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] nvme: split out metadata vs non metadata end_io uring_cmd completions
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:41:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69598e37-fb91-5b92-bb80-b68457a7b6f8@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzG5/1zSdiMlMLnB@infradead.org>
On 9/26/22 8:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:52:54PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> For both of these, how about we just simplify like below? I think
>> at that point it's useless to name them anyway.
>
> I think this version is better than the previous one, but I'd still
> prefer a non-anonymous union.
Sure, I don't really care. What name do you want for it?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 18:28 [PATCHSET 0/5] Enable alloc caching and batched freeing for passthrough Jens Axboe
2022-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: enable batched allocation for blk_mq_alloc_request() Jens Axboe
2022-09-23 14:52 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-09-23 15:13 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-09-23 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-24 0:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-24 1:01 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-24 1:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-24 11:56 ` Pankaj Raghav
2022-09-24 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] block: change request end_io handler to pass back a return value Jens Axboe
2022-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: allow end_io based requests in the completion batch handling Jens Axboe
2022-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: split out metadata vs non metadata end_io uring_cmd completions Jens Axboe
2022-09-23 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 20:52 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-26 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-26 14:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-09-26 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-26 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-26 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-26 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: enable batched completions of passthrough IO Jens Axboe
2022-09-23 15:16 ` [PATCHSET 0/5] Enable alloc caching and batched freeing for passthrough Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 15:19 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-23 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 15:22 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-27 1:44 [PATCHSET v2 " Jens Axboe
2022-09-27 1:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: split out metadata vs non metadata end_io uring_cmd completions Jens Axboe
2022-09-27 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-28 13:51 ` Anuj gupta
2022-09-28 14:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69598e37-fb91-5b92-bb80-b68457a7b6f8@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.