All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<gost.dev@samsung.com>
Cc: <a.manzanares@samsung.com>, <vishak.g@samsung.com>,
	<neeraj.kernel@gmail.com>, Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/17] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:20:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69680889b4a78_1183cf100e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109124437.4025893-5-s.neeraj@samsung.com>

Neeraj Kumar wrote:
> Prior to LSA 2.1 Support, label in slot means only namespace
> label. But with LSA 2.1 a label can be either namespace or
> region label.
> 
> Slot validation routine validates label slot by calculating
> label checksum. It was only validating namespace label.
> This changeset also validates region label if present.
> 
> In previous patch to_lsa_label() was introduced along with
> to_label(). to_label() returns only namespace label whereas
> to_lsa_label() returns union nd_lsa_label*
> 
> In this patch We have converted all usage of to_label()

NIT: don't use 'We'

> to to_lsa_label()
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> index 17e2a1f5a6da..9854cb45fb62 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> @@ -312,16 +312,6 @@ static union nd_lsa_label *to_lsa_label(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int slot)
>  	return (union nd_lsa_label *) label;
>  }
>  
> -static struct nd_namespace_label *to_label(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int slot)
> -{
> -	unsigned long label, base;
> -
> -	base = (unsigned long) nd_label_base(ndd);
> -	label = base + sizeof_namespace_label(ndd) * slot;
> -
> -	return (struct nd_namespace_label *) label;
> -}
> -
>  #define for_each_clear_bit_le(bit, addr, size) \
>  	for ((bit) = find_next_zero_bit_le((addr), (size), 0);  \
>  	     (bit) < (size);                                    \
> @@ -382,7 +372,7 @@ static bool nsl_validate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  {
>  	u64 sum, sum_save;
>  
> -	if (!ndd->cxl && !efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))
> +	if (!efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))

What does this change have to do with region label validation during slot
validation?

>  		return true;
>  
>  	sum_save = nsl_get_checksum(ndd, nd_label);
> @@ -397,13 +387,25 @@ static void nsl_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  {
>  	u64 sum;
>  
> -	if (!ndd->cxl && !efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))
> +	if (!efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))

This and the above seem like cleanups because efi_namespace_label_has()
already checks !ndd->cxl?  Was that the intent?  Perhaps as a separate
cleanup?

Rest of the patch looks reasonable,
Ira

>  		return;
>  	nsl_set_checksum(ndd, nd_label, 0);
>  	sum = nd_fletcher64(nd_label, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd), 1);
>  	nsl_set_checksum(ndd, nd_label, sum);
>  }
>  
> +static bool region_label_validate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
> +				struct cxl_region_label *region_label)
> +{
> +	u64 sum, sum_save;
> +
> +	sum_save = __le64_to_cpu(region_label->checksum);
> +	region_label->checksum = __cpu_to_le64(0);
> +	sum = nd_fletcher64(region_label, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd), 1);
> +	region_label->checksum = __cpu_to_le64(sum_save);
> +	return sum == sum_save;
> +}
> +
>  static void region_label_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  				   struct cxl_region_label *region_label)
>  {
> @@ -415,16 +417,34 @@ static void region_label_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  }
>  
>  static bool slot_valid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
> -		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label, u32 slot)
> +		       union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label, u32 slot)
>  {
> +	struct cxl_region_label *region_label = &lsa_label->region_label;
> +	struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
> +	enum label_type type;
>  	bool valid;
> +	static const char * const label_name[] = {
> +		[RG_LABEL_TYPE] = "region",
> +		[NS_LABEL_TYPE] = "namespace",
> +	};
>  
>  	/* check that we are written where we expect to be written */
> -	if (slot != nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label))
> -		return false;
> -	valid = nsl_validate_checksum(ndd, nd_label);
> +	if (is_region_label(ndd, lsa_label)) {
> +		type = RG_LABEL_TYPE;
> +		if (slot != __le32_to_cpu(region_label->slot))
> +			return false;
> +		valid = region_label_validate_checksum(ndd, region_label);
> +	} else {
> +		type = NS_LABEL_TYPE;
> +		if (slot != nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label))
> +			return false;
> +		valid = nsl_validate_checksum(ndd, nd_label);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!valid)
> -		dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "fail checksum. slot: %d\n", slot);
> +		dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "%s label checksum fail. slot: %d\n",
> +			label_name[type], slot);
> +
>  	return valid;
>  }
>  
> @@ -440,14 +460,16 @@ int nd_label_reserve_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>  	for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
>  		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>  		struct nd_region *nd_region = NULL;
> +		union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>  		struct nd_label_id label_id;
>  		struct resource *res;
>  		uuid_t label_uuid;
>  		u32 flags;
>  
> -		nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> +		lsa_label = to_lsa_label(ndd, slot);
> +		nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>  
> -		if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot))
> +		if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		nsl_get_uuid(ndd, nd_label, &label_uuid);
> @@ -598,18 +620,30 @@ int nd_label_active_count(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
> +		struct cxl_region_label *region_label;
>  		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
> -
> -		nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> -
> -		if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot)) {
> -			u32 label_slot = nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label);
> -			u64 size = nsl_get_rawsize(ndd, nd_label);
> -			u64 dpa = nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label);
> +		union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
> +		u32 lslot;
> +		u64 size, dpa;
> +
> +		lsa_label = to_lsa_label(ndd, slot);
> +		nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
> +		region_label = &lsa_label->region_label;
> +
> +		if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot)) {
> +			if (is_region_label(ndd, lsa_label)) {
> +				lslot = __le32_to_cpu(region_label->slot);
> +				size = __le64_to_cpu(region_label->rawsize);
> +				dpa = __le64_to_cpu(region_label->dpa);
> +			} else {
> +				lslot = nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label);
> +				size = nsl_get_rawsize(ndd, nd_label);
> +				dpa = nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label);
> +			}
>  
>  			dev_dbg(ndd->dev,
>  				"slot%d invalid slot: %d dpa: %llx size: %llx\n",
> -					slot, label_slot, dpa, size);
> +					slot, lslot, dpa, size);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		count++;
> @@ -627,10 +661,10 @@ union nd_lsa_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
> -		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
> +		union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>  
> -		nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> -		if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot))
> +		lsa_label = to_lsa_label(ndd, slot);
> +		if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (n-- == 0)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20260109124454epcas5p4513168fdb4253ef1c5ac1656985417fd@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2026-01-09 12:44 ` [PATCH V5 00/17] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 01/17] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_REGION_LABELING flag to set region label Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-14 21:22     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 02/17] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 03/17] nvdimm/label: Add namespace/region label support as per LSA 2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 10:57       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-21  0:35     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 04/17] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-14 21:20     ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2026-01-23 11:02       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:55     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:38     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 05/17] nvdimm/label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:56     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:41     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-23 11:05       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 06/17] nvdimm/label: Preserve region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:43     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 07/17] nvdimm/label: Add region label delete support Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-21  0:44     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 08/17] nvdimm/label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:08       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-21  0:45     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 09/17] nvdimm/label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:46     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-23 11:11       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-23 11:20       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 10/17] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:14       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 11/17] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:17     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:17       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 12/17] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:18     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 13/17] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 14/17] cxl/pmem_region: Introduce CONFIG_CXL_PMEM_REGION for core/pmem_region.c Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:19     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 15/17] cxl/pmem_region: Add sysfs attribute cxl region label updation/deletion Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-14 17:00     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-23 11:22       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:21     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:25       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 16/17] cxl/pmem_region: Create pmem region using information parsed from LSA Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:28     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:28       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 17/17] cxl/pmem: Add CXL LSA 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:29     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21 15:37   ` [PATCH V5 00/17] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and " Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69680889b4a78_1183cf100e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.