From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>,
Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Coreteam <coreteam@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Netfilter: match "tcp option" with the same type present multiple times
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 23:22:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6989a3c1-313c-4802-b78c-ceb3f2dbd3da@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c08f9e6-123f-4514-a865-6f9e0f979167@suse.de>
Hi Fernando,
On 28/09/2026 23:17, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> On 9/28/26 10:54 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>> On 9/28/26 2:13 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Hello Netfilter devs,
>>>
>>> First, thank you for maintaining Netfilter in the kernel and the
>>> userspace tools.
>>>
>>> The MPTCP selftests are switching from IPTables to NFTables, and
>>> Clashiko reported that this part of a rule wouldn't match anything:
>>>
>>> tcp option mptcp subtype remove-addr drop
>>>
>>> When an MPTCP REMOVE_ADDR suboption (type 0x30, len >=4, subtype 0x4) is
>>> added to the TCP options, it is added after an MPTCP DSS option (type
>>> 0x30, len >= 8, subtype 0x2). In other words, there will be two MPTCP
>>> (type 30) options in the TCP options. It looks like Netfilter doesn't
>>> handle that, because it stops processing other TCP options when the
>>> expected type is found:
>>>
>>> net/netfilter/nft_exthdr.c:nft_exthdr_tcp_eval() {
>>> ...
>>> for (i = sizeof(*tcph); i < tcphdr_len - 1; i += optl) {
>>> optl = optlen(opt, i);
>>>
>>> if (priv->type != opt[i])
>>> continue;
>>> ...
>>> return; // <== it will look at the first MPTCP option
>>> }
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> It looks like it shouldn't stop if the wrong subtype is found, but the
>>> subtype is not compared there if I'm not mistaken. Should there be a fix
>>> to support this case?
>>>
>>> For more details about the Clashiko report:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/179058242453.3145.1450534124183352369@kernel.org
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, I'm probably missing something, but adding the following doesn't
>>> seem to have any effect on my side:
>>>
>>> nft add table ip filter
>>> nft add chain ip filter OUTPUT \
>>> { type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept; }
>>> nft insert rule ip filter OUTPUT tcp option mptcp exists counter drop
>>>
>>> Same with "mptcp subtype mp-capable", other subtypes or other types like
>>> "timestamp". But if I use ...
>>>
>>> nft insert rule ip filter OUTPUT meta l4proto tcp counter drop
>>>
>>> ... then the drop is effective. Any idea what I'm missing here? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> (Also, it looks like the MPTCP suboptions are not documented in the nft
>>> man page :) )
>>>
>>
>> Tomorrow there should be a patch in netfilter-devel adding it, we
>> definitively should put more work into documentation.
>>
>
> While at it, I will also document the existing limitation that was
> discussed above too.
Great, thank you for looking at all this :)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 12:13 Netfilter: match "tcp option" with the same type present multiple times Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 13:13 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 20:26 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:08 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 20:56 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:22 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-28 21:23 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 20:54 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:17 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-09-28 21:22 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-09-28 21:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-29 9:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-29 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-29 10:40 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-29 12:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-30 18:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-10-06 23:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-07 8:01 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-10-07 10:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-07 8:17 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-28 21:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2026-09-29 9:34 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6989a3c1-313c-4802-b78c-ceb3f2dbd3da@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.