From: Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Sahil Siddiq <sahilcdq@proton.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 0/5] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:28:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69a7da95-c050-4a22-b295-ff3c2eb34fb4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <360803dd-f1e0-48a3-8917-2477d8a821a9@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2/6/25 8:47 PM, Sahil Siddiq wrote:
> On 2/6/25 12:42 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:26 AM Sahil Siddiq <icegambit91@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/4/25 11:45 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
>>>> PS: Please note that you can check packed_vq SVQ implementation
>>>> already without CVQ, as these features are totally orthogonal :).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right. Now that I can ping with the ctrl features turned off, I think
>>> this should take precedence. There's another issue specific to the
>>> packed virtqueue case. It causes the kernel to crash. I have been
>>> investigating this and the situation here looks very similar to what's
>>> explained in Jason Wang's mail [2]. My plan of action is to apply his
>>> changes in L2's kernel and check if that resolves the problem.
>>>
>>> The details of the crash can be found in this mail [3].
>>>
>>
>> If you're testing this series without changes, I think that is caused
>> by not implementing the packed version of vhost_svq_get_buf.
>>
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-12/msg01902.html
>>
>
> Oh, apologies, I think I had misunderstood your response in the linked mail.
> Until now, I thought they were unrelated. In that case, I'll implement the
> packed version of vhost_svq_get_buf. Hopefully that fixes it :).
>
I noticed one thing while testing some of the changes that I have made.
I haven't finished making the relevant changes to all the functions which
will have to handle split and packed vq differently. L2's kernel crashes
when I launch L0-QEMU with ctrl_vq=on,ctrl_rx=on. However, when I start
L0-QEMU with ctrl_vq=off,ctrl_rx=off,ctrl_vlan=off,ctrl_mac_addr=off, L2's
kernel boots successfully. Tracing L2-QEMU also confirms that the packed
feature is enabled. With all the ctrl features disabled, I think pinging
will also be possible once I finish implementing the packed versions of
the other functions.
There's another thing that I am confused about regarding the current
implementation (in the master branch).
In hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c:vhost_svq_vring_write_descs() [1],
svq->free_head saves the descriptor in the specified format using
"le16_to_cpu" (line 171). On the other hand, the value of i is stored
in the native endianness using "cpu_to_le16" (line 168). If "i" is to be
stored in the native endianness (little endian in this case), then
should svq->free_head first be converted to little endian before being
assigned to "i" at the start of the function (line 142)?
Thanks,
Sahil
[1] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-05 20:34 [RFC v4 0/5] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-05 20:34 ` [RFC v4 1/5] vhost: Refactor vhost_svq_add_split Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-10 8:40 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-05 20:34 ` [RFC v4 2/5] vhost: Write descriptors to packed svq Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-10 8:54 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-11 15:58 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-05 20:34 ` [RFC v4 3/5] vhost: Data structure changes to support packed vqs Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-10 8:55 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-11 15:59 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-05 20:34 ` [RFC v4 4/5] vdpa: Allocate memory for svq and map them to vdpa Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-05 20:34 ` [RFC v4 5/5] vdpa: Support setting vring_base for packed svq Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-10 9:27 ` [RFC v4 0/5] Add packed virtqueue to shadow virtqueue Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-11 15:57 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-15 17:27 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-16 8:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-17 5:45 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-17 7:50 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-12-19 19:37 ` Sahil Siddiq
2024-12-20 6:58 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-01-03 13:06 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-01-07 8:05 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-01-19 6:37 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-01-21 16:37 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-01-24 5:46 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-01-24 7:34 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-01-31 5:04 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-01-31 6:57 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-02-04 12:49 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-02-04 18:10 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-02-04 18:15 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-02-06 5:26 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-02-06 7:12 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-02-06 15:17 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-02-10 10:58 ` Sahil Siddiq [this message]
2025-02-10 14:23 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-02-10 16:25 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-02-11 7:57 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-03-06 5:25 ` Sahil Siddiq
2025-03-06 7:23 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-03-24 13:54 ` Sahil Siddiq
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69a7da95-c050-4a22-b295-ff3c2eb34fb4@gmail.com \
--to=icegambit91@gmail.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sahilcdq@proton.me \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.