All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: pavrampu@linux.ibm.com, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] [PATCH v5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs test truncate_reserve_wraparound.c
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:24:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69c5175d.df0a0220.190c3f.bcd5@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310112044.123827-1-pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>

Hi!

Here a deeper analysis on the patch:

> Changes in v5:
> - removed unused parameters from sigbus_handler call
> - Added check for after_mmap_rsvd == initial_rsvd + 1
> - Used TST_EXP_EQ_LU for comparsion

This should stay away from the commit message. And commit message should have
a meaningful explaination of the test or what was done by the patch.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  runtest/hugetlb                               |   1 +
>  testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore               |   1 +
>  .../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap35.c  | 125 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap35.c
> 
> diff --git a/runtest/hugetlb b/runtest/hugetlb
> index 0896d3c94..8ee0e6f82 100644
> --- a/runtest/hugetlb
> +++ b/runtest/hugetlb
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ hugemmap30 hugemmap30
>  hugemmap31 hugemmap31
>  hugemmap32 hugemmap32
>  hugemmap34 hugemmap34
> +hugemmap35 hugemmap35
>  hugemmap05_1 hugemmap05 -m
>  hugemmap05_2 hugemmap05 -s
>  hugemmap05_3 hugemmap05 -s -m
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
> index b4455de51..0e59035df 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap31
>  /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap32
>  /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap34
> +/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap35
>  /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat01
>  /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat02
>  /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat03
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap35.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap35.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..dc678661e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap35.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 David Gibson & Adam Litke, IBM Corporation.
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]

This is deprecated. Pleae use /*\

> + *
> + * Origin: https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/blob/master/tests/truncate_reserve_wraparound.c
> + *
> + * At one stage, improper handling of tests against i_size could mess
> + * up accounting of reserved hugepages on certain truncate
> + * operations.

Can we write the description a bit better? At the moment is a bit generic.

> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include <setjmp.h>
> +#include "hugetlb.h"
> +
> +#define MNTPOINT "hugetlbfs/"
> +
> +static long hpage_size;
> +static int fd = -1;
> +
> +static sigjmp_buf sig_escape;
> +
> +static void sigbus_handler(int signum LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> +{
> +	siglongjmp(sig_escape, 17);
> +}
> +
> +static void run_test(void)
> +{
> +
> +	static int sigbus_count;

Is it needed to be static? We just need `int sigbus_count = 0`.

> +	unsigned long initial_rsvd, after_map_rsvd, after_touch_rsvd;
> +	unsigned long after_trunc_rsvd, after_unmap_rsvd, after_sigbus_rsvd;
> +	volatile unsigned int *q;
> +	void *p;
> +
> +	sigbus_count = 0;

And this goes away.

> +
> +	initial_rsvd = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_RSVD);
> +	tst_res(TINFO, "Reserve count before map: %lu", initial_rsvd);
> +
> +	p = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> +			fd, 0);
> +	q = p;
> +
> +	after_map_rsvd = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_RSVD);
> +
> +	TST_EXP_EQ_LU(initial_rsvd + 1, after_map_rsvd);
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto windup;
> +
> +	*q = 0;
> +	after_touch_rsvd = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_RSVD);
> +
> +	TST_EXP_EQ_LU(initial_rsvd, after_touch_rsvd);
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto windup;
> +
> +	SAFE_FTRUNCATE(fd, 0);
> +	after_trunc_rsvd = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_RSVD);
> +
> +	TST_EXP_EQ_LU(initial_rsvd, after_trunc_rsvd);
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto windup;
> +
> +	if (sigsetjmp(sig_escape, 1) == 0)
> +		*q; /* Fault, triggering a SIGBUS */
> +	else
> +		sigbus_count++;
> +
> +	if (sigbus_count != 1) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "Didn't SIGBUS after truncate");
> +		goto windup;
> +	}
> +
> +	after_sigbus_rsvd = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_RSVD);
> +
> +	TST_EXP_EQ_LU(initial_rsvd, after_sigbus_rsvd);
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto windup;
> +
> +windup:
> +	SAFE_MUNMAP(p, hpage_size);
> +	after_unmap_rsvd = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_RSVD);
> +	tst_res(TINFO, "Reserve count after munmap: %lu", after_unmap_rsvd);

This variable is printed but never checked inside the test.

> +
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	hpage_size = tst_get_hugepage_size();

Need space here.

> +	fd = tst_creat_unlinked(MNTPOINT, 0, 0600);
> +
> +	struct sigaction sa = {
> +		.sa_handler = sigbus_handler,
> +		.sa_flags = 0,
> +	};
> +
> +	SAFE_SIGACTION(SIGBUS, &sa, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	if (fd >= 0)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fd);

Pleae use fd != -1 here.


Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-26 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 11:20 [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] [PATCH v5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs test truncate_reserve_wraparound.c Pavithra
2026-03-26 11:24 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69c5175d.df0a0220.190c3f.bcd5@mx.google.com \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=pavrampu@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.