From: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: keys@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add djbw@kernel.org to 1ED2916A667D8802.asc
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:48:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69d96225e9f67_6c31a10035@djbw-dev.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adiZwNiyyW6QrSmF@monoceros>
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hallo Dan,
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 06:49:33PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> >
> > mQINBE6TN1IBEADBi0Ztes1AmBXGUHh4zp7z8YMykXtF2o+Vd5uscmp0Z+CNoXMu
> > waEOmxQjwjC6khh7gl/1i0YNMHtwTaNFgXJKVluH5uMXpeo5GXrCHmI14YNhJmRn
> > 3AHzmM8wh9H0lCy96F71Wv13itJINy9AKYarQJcIUmpMxxO/f5VoE1UYeoouy19+
> > ...
> > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>
> The two UIDs that are already tracked in the pgpkeys repo are only
> protected by SHA1, and also the key binding is affected. GnuPG has no
> issues with that, but other tools (e.g. Sequioa) take this more serious.
> (See e.g. https://www.schneier.com/tag/sha-1/ for more details. And
> https://lore.kernel.org/keys/fxotnlhsyl2frp54xtguy7ryrucuwselanazixeax3motyyoo3@7vf7ip6gxyvx/
> for how to fix that.)
>
> While you can address this yourself, your key has several signatures
> protected by SHA1, which is somewhat the same issue, but you'd need the
> cooperation of the guys who signed your key before, to fix that. The
> easiest way to do that is to ask them to resign your certificate.
> In return you can offer to resign their certs as there are several
> SHA1-protected signatures by you on other keys. See
> https://www.kleine-koenig.org/~uwe/resign-sha1/?certid=1ED2916A667D8802
> for the "todo list".
>
> Don't hesitate to ask if questions arise.
Certainly the sq instructions look more approachable than doing this
with gpg. Given my old intel.com address is now disabled I assume I
should just delete that uid and then only need to fixup the gmail one?
For using an offline backup gpg directory to redo the signatures looks
like I can ask sq to use a different PGP_CERT_D directory. If you have a
ready example for that case that would save some fumbling time.
> From my side this doesn't need to stop adding your updated cert to the
> pgpkeys repo, as it doesn't make things worse than they already are.
Thanks for the heads up!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 1:49 Add djbw@kernel.org to 1ED2916A667D8802.asc Dan Williams
2026-04-10 6:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-04-10 20:48 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2026-04-10 21:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69d96225e9f67_6c31a10035@djbw-dev.notmuch \
--to=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=keys@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.