From: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cxl/memdev: Hold memdev lock during memdev poison injection/clear
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 12:23:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69da9fa696d0f_6c31a100e8@djbw-dev.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfc0979a-b01a-4c90-8bc8-7a60fb795dc7@intel.com>
Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 3/18/26 4:59 AM, Li Ming wrote:
> >
> > 在 2026/3/17 23:00, Dave Jiang 写道:
> >>
> >> On 3/14/26 12:06 AM, Li Ming wrote:
> >>> CXL memdev poison injection/clearing debugfs interfaces are visible
> >>> before the CXL memdev endpoint initialization, If user accesses the
> >>> interfaces before cxlmd->endpoint updated, it is possible to access an
> >>> invalid endpoint in cxl_dpa_to_region().
> >>>
> >>> Hold CXL memdev lock at the beginning of the interfaces, this blocks the
> >>> interfaces until CXL memdev probing completed.
> >>>
> >>> The following patch will check the given endpoint validity in
> >>> cxl_dpa_to_region().
> >>>
> >>> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> >> Hi Ming, I dropped this patch with Dan's comments [1] and updated cxl/next. Please check and make sure everything looks ok to you. Thanks!
> >>
> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/69b8b81621e16_452b100e@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch/
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I think there is no change needed in this patch, just need a independent patch for holding memdev lock in cxl_region_debugfs_poison_inject/clear.
> >
> > Or you want to review this patch again?
>
> No. Maybe I misunderstood the comment from Dan. So we should keep this patch?
tl;dr: yes, this patch is *now* valid.
As originally structured having patch2 before patch3 added no value.
Going forward I would say do not structure a series such that a new lock
taken in patch N starts being useful in patch N+1.
I assume that is what:
"The following patch will check the given endpoint validity in
cxl_dpa_to_region()."
...is trying to say, but when commits are applied to the tree it is
difficult to see that this commit was from a series.
So do pick this one up, but the changelog needs adjusting. Something
like:
"cxl_dpa_to_region() assumes that it is running a context where it is not
racing changes to "cxlmd->dev.driver". Acquire the memdev device lock in
the debugfs entry points to preclude debugfs usage racing cxl_mem driver
detach."
With that you can add:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-11 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-14 7:06 [PATCH v2 0/4] cxl: Consolidate cxlmd->endpoint accessing Li Ming
2026-03-14 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] driver core: Add conditional guard support for device_lock() Li Ming
2026-03-14 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cxl/memdev: Hold memdev lock during memdev poison injection/clear Li Ming
2026-03-17 15:00 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-18 11:59 ` Li Ming
2026-03-18 15:36 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-19 11:10 ` Li Ming
2026-04-11 19:23 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2026-04-21 10:48 ` Li Ming
2026-04-21 15:29 ` Dave Jiang
2026-04-22 12:09 ` Li Ming
2026-04-22 14:42 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-14 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cxl/pci: Hold memdev lock in cxl_event_trace_record() Li Ming
2026-03-14 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cxl/pci: Check memdev driver binding status in cxl_reset_done() Li Ming
2026-03-16 17:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cxl: Consolidate cxlmd->endpoint accessing Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69da9fa696d0f_6c31a100e8@djbw-dev.notmuch \
--to=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.