All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongling Zeng <zhongling0719@126.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
	 Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>,
	clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, lizetao1@huawei.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: handle highmem folios in read_key_bytes
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:14:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A828ABB.10507@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e30fed1-5879-4a26-a1a2-d1a3302bc068@gmx.com>


在 2026年08月17日 10:55, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2026/8/17 11:50, Hongling Zeng 写道:
>> On 32-bit systems with highmem, folio_address() can return NULL for
>> unmapped highmem folios. When this NULL is passed as the dest parameter
>> to read_key_bytes() with a non-NULL dest_folio, it violates the 
>> function's
>> contract (which requires dest to be non-NULL when dest_folio is 
>> provided).
>
> But metadata folios are not allocated by page cache, but by btrfs 
> itself, which always use GFP_NOFS then attach the folio to page cache, 
> thus should not get highmem memory in the first place.
>
> And there is no way to trigger read from userspace on btree inode, so 
> there should be no highmem folios from the beginning.
   Thanks for the review.

   I was not able to reproduce this on a real system. This was 
identified through code analysis with assistance from glm 5.5, not from a
   real-world encounter.

   Your analysis about btrfs using ~__GFP_FS for folio allocation and 
the lack
   of userspace trigger paths makes sense. The proposed changes are 
based on the
   generic folio_address() behavior and the theoretical dest/dest_folio
   invariant, but I do not currently have evidence that a highmem folio can
   reach read_key_bytes() in this state.

   I will withdraw this patch rather than claim a reachable highmem bug
   without a reproducer.

>
>>
>> The original bug had two symptoms:
>> 1. Unsigned len underflow when len -= copy_bytes executes (infinite 
>> loop)
>> 2. The folio remains uninitialized because the copy block is skipped
>
> So did you really hit the problem in the real world?
>
>>
>> Fix requires two changes:
>>
>> 1. Change "if (!dest)" to "if (!dest && !dest_folio)"
>>     - Prevents the "counting-only" mode when dest_folio is provided
>>     - Fixes the underflow/infinite loop
>>
>> 2. Change "if (dest)" to "if (dest || dest_folio)"
>>     - Ensures the copy block executes when dest_folio is provided
>>     - Allows kmap_local_folio() to properly map the highmem folio
>>     - Actually writes data to the folio
>>
>> Without the second change, the highmem folio is not populated even
>> though the read succeeds, causing subsequent fs-verity verification to
>> operate on stale or uninitialized data.
>>
>> Fixes: 884937793db5 ("btrfs: convert read_key_bytes() to take a folio")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
>
> Missing LLM disclosure.
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/verity.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/verity.c b/fs/btrfs/verity.c
>> index 983365a73541..80bc945c7dcb 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/verity.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/verity.c
>> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int read_key_bytes(struct btrfs_inode 
>> *inode, u8 key_type, u64 offset,
>>           }
>>             /* desc = NULL to just sum all the item lengths */
>> -        if (!dest)
>> +        if (!dest && !dest_folio)
>>               copy_end = item_end;
>>           else
>>               copy_end = min(offset + len, item_end);
>> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int read_key_bytes(struct btrfs_inode 
>> *inode, u8 key_type, u64 offset,
>>           /* Offset from the start of item for copying */
>>           copy_offset = offset - key.offset;
>>   -        if (dest) {
>> +        if (dest || dest_folio) {
>>               if (dest_folio)
>>                   kaddr = kmap_local_folio(dest_folio, 0);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-17  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17  2:20 [PATCH] btrfs: handle highmem folios in read_key_bytes Hongling Zeng
2026-08-17  2:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-17  4:14   ` Hongling Zeng [this message]
2026-08-17  6:02     ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-17  6:37       ` Hongling Zeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6A828ABB.10507@126.com \
    --to=zhongling0719@126.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizetao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.