From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set section order for device DAX
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 17:00:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6AEC3FC2-2365-4EB5-A022-8AB0EC111073@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143901c-5036-4b79-8135-21ce57075136@linux.dev>
> On Sep 5, 2026, at 16:20, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Muchun,
Hi,
>
> On 8/31/26 3:53 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
>> Device DAX can use vmemmap optimization only when a full section is
>> populated with a compound-page geometry. Record that geometry in the
>> section order before populating the section, so later vmemmap accounting
>> and population decisions can use the section state directly.
>> Clear the section order when the section becomes empty again. Also reject
>> partial additions to a section that already has optimized vmemmap mappings,
>> because a section cannot safely mix optimized and ordinary vmemmap layouts.
>
> Perhaps we should explain why they cannot be safely mixed.
Yes, because compound_nr_pages() determines the number of struct pages to
initialize with section as the smallest granularity, they cannot be mixed.
>
>> Partial additions continue to use ordinary vmemmap population, so they do
>> not save vmemmap memory. Such additions are uncommon, and the lost saving
>> is negligible.
>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> mm/mm_init.c | 13 ++++---------
>> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> Also, the issue sashiko reported looks like it was pre-existing, not
> introduced by this patch. So:
>
> Acked-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Qi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 7:53 [PATCH 00/11] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION Muchun Song
2026-08-31 9:44 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 9:49 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: factor out shared vmemmap tail page allocation Muchun Song
2026-09-01 3:05 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: open-code init_compound_tail() Muchun Song
2026-09-01 3:18 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: prepare DAX vmemmap population for section orders Muchun Song
2026-09-03 6:36 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set section order for device DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-05 8:20 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-05 9:00 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-05 8:35 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-05 9:08 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: move HVO helpers to a public header Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] powerpc/mm: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop the extra tail page from device DAX reservation Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop unused section_nr_vmemmap_pages() arguments Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] Documentation/mm: update DAX vmemmap deduplication docs Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6AEC3FC2-2365-4EB5-A022-8AB0EC111073@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.